(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-01-19
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-01-13 to 2020-01-19.
During this period, we have:
* 2185 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-01-26
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-01-20 to 2020-01-26.
During this period, we have:
* 2153 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-02-02
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-01-27 to 2020-02-02.
During this period, we have:
* 2188 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-02-09
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-02-03 to 2020-02-09.
During this period, we have:
* 2010 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-02-16
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-02-10 to 2020-02-16.
During this period, we have:
* 2180 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-02-23
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-02-17 to 2020-02-23.
During this period, we have:
* 1969 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-01
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-02-24 to 2020-03-01.
During this period, we have:
* 1930 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-08
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-03-02 to 2020-03-08.
During this period, we have:
* 2239 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-15
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-03-09 to 2020-03-15.
During this period, we have:
* 1903 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)a
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-22
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-03-16 to 2020-03-22.
During this period, we have:
* 1907 bui
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-29
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-03-23 to 2020-03-29.
During this period, we have:
* 1811 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-04-05
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-03-30 to 2020-04-05.
During this period, we have:
* 1715 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-04-12
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-04-06 to 2020-04-12.
During this period, we have:
* 1801 buil
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:22 PM Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:20:03AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:05:25PM +0300, nonamel...@ukr.net wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone!
> >>>
> >>> As I
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:15 PM Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Building CURRENT on my laptop takes very very long because every little
> change in llvm/clang makes it recompile a complete compiler. So I want to
> build with CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=xtoolchain-llvm10 (10.0) and
> WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes.
> I
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-04-19
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-04-13 to 2020-04-19.
During this period, we have:
* 2136 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-04-26
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-04-20 to 2020-04-26.
During this period, we have:
* 2503 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-03
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-04-27 to 2020-05-03.
During this period, we have:
* 2099 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-10
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-05-04 to 2020-05-10.
During this period, we have:
* 2003 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-17
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-05-11 to 2020-05-17.
During this period, we have:
* 1977 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-24
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-05-18 to 2020-05-24.
During this period, we have:
* 2064 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-31
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-05-25 to 2020-05-31.
During this period, we have:
* 1877 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-07
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-06-31 to 2020-06-07.
During this period, we have:
* 2077 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-14
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-06-08 to 2020-06-14.
During this period, we have:
* 1798 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-21
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-06-15 to 2020-06-21.
During this period, we have:
* 2272 buil
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
> Running poudriere on recent CURRENT with (recent) 12-STABLE and CURRENT
> jails reveals a weird behaviour recently when hitting Ctrl-T:
...
> Is this debug fallout from /bin/sh?
It's because kern.tty_info_kstacks is on by default now:
https
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-06-28
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-06-22 to 2020-06-28.
During this period, we have:
* 2388 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-07-05
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-06-29 to 2020-07-05.
During this period, we have:
* 1899 buil
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-07-12
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-07-06 to 2020-07-12.
During this period, we have:
* 1964 builds (95.7% (+0.0) passed, 4.3% (+0.0) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-07-19
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-07-13 to 2020-07-19.
During this period, we have:
* 1699 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-07-26
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-07-20 to 2020-07-26.
During this period, we have:
* 2211 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-02
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-07-27 to 2020-08-02.
During this period, we have:
* 1744 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-09
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-08-02 to 2020-08-09.
During this period, we have:
* 1823 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-16
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-08-10 to 2020-08-16.
During this period, we have:
* 2008 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-23
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-08-17 to 2020-08-23.
During this period, we have:
* 2124 buil
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-30
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-08-24 to 2020-08-30.
During this period, we have:
* 2429 buil
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:57 PM Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:06 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> >
> > FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-08-30
> > ===
> > * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/
> >
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.)
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-09-06
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-08-31 to 2020-09-06.
During this period, we have:
* 2089 buil
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-09-13
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-09-07 to 2020-09-13.
During this period, we have:
* 2533 builds (94.0% (+2.0) passed, 6.0% (-2.0) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:30 PM Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> On 15/09/2020 23:13, Eirik Øverby wrote:
> > On 9/15/20 9:50 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> On 15/09/2020 22:36, Eirik Øverby wrote:
> >>> Now, since I updated from r365358 to r365688, I have not once been able
> >>> to wake from sleep.
> >>
>
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-09-20
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-09-14 to 2020-09-20.
During this period, we have:
* 2056 builds (95.5% (+1.5) passed, 4.5% (-1.5) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-09-27
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-09-21 to 2020-09-27.
During this period, we have:
* 2211 builds (93.7% (-1.8) passed, 6.3% (+1.8) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-10-04
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-09-28 to 2020-10-04.
During this period, we have:
* 1983 builds (93.9% (+0.2) passed, 6.1% (-0.2) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-10-11
===
Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period
from 2020-10-05 to 2020-10-11.
During this period, we have:
* 1809 builds (94.6% (+0.7) passed, 5.4% (-0.7) failed) of buildworld and
buildkern
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:22 PM Eirik Øverby wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:05:43 AM CEST Warner Losh wrote:
> > I too can report this for my Lenovo Yoga running code as of September 13,
> > but with manu's latest drm... It used to work fine, but my last build on
> > the system was
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 4:25 AM Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-01, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
> > This is why I asked FreeBSD to provide anonymous read-only ssh://
> > support for git. I'm very grateful they support it.
> >
> > One thing that I need to do with the HardenedBSD infrastructure i
Hello,
As mentioned in the "OpenZFS imports, status update":
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-git/2021-June/13.html
We're going to rename the current openzfs vendor branch,
vendor/openzfs, to vendor/openzfs/legacy
and import directly the master and zfs-2.1-release branches from
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 7:45 PM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As mentioned in the "OpenZFS imports, status update":
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-git/2021-June/13.html
>
> We're going to rename the current openzfs vendor bran
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:56 AM Alan Somers wrote:
>
> Google Compute Engine has images for 11.4-RELEASE, 12.2-RELEASE, and
> 13.0-RELEASE. Are there any images for current snapshots, and if so
> what are their names?
> -Alan
You can use this command to list all the images built by re:
gcl
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:30 AM Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>
> As of b014e0f15bc7 the ASLR (Address Space Layout
> Randomization) feature becomes enabled for the all 64-bit
> binaries by default.
>
> Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) is an exploit mitigation
> technique implemented in the majori
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
