On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:36:24 +0100
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Am 2024-01-10 22:49, schrieb Mark Millard:
>
> > I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never
> > propose
> > changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid:
>
> [good points I fully agre
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 02:21:19 +
Lexi Winter wrote:
> hi list,
>
> i'm having a recurring problem with poudriere that i hope someone might
> have an idea about.
>
> i'm building packages with poudriere on a system with 32GB memory, with
> tmpfs and md disabled in poudriere (so it's using ZFS
On 1/11/24 03:21, Lexi Winter wrote:
hi list,
i'm having a recurring problem with poudriere that i hope someone might
have an idea about.
i'm building packages with poudriere on a system with 32GB memory, with
tmpfs and md disabled in poudriere (so it's using ZFS only) and with the
ZFS ARC limi
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:21:19AM +, Lexi Winter wrote:
hi list,
i'm having a recurring problem with poudriere that i hope someone might
have an idea about.
i'm building packages with poudriere on a system with 32GB memory, with
tmpfs and md disabled in poudriere (so it's using ZFS only) a
On 11/01/2024 09:54, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:36:24 +0100
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
[..]
There's one possibility which nobody talked about yet... changing the
default to noatime at install time in fstab / zfs set.
I fully agree to not violate POLA by changing the default
On 11 Jan 2024, at 7:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> On 11/01/2024 09:54, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:36:24 +0100
>> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>> There's one possibility which nobody talked about yet... changing the
>>> default to noatime at install time in fstab / zf
> Am 2024-01-10 22:49, schrieb Mark Millard:
>
> > I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never
> > propose
> > changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid:
>
> [good points I fully agree on]
>
> There's one possibility which nobody talked about yet
Olivier Certner wrote:
> Both the examples above prompt some straight objections on the current
> usefulness of "atime". First, unless you've disabled building the locate
> database in cron (enabled by default, on a weekly basis), access times on
> directories lose most of their usefulness.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 6:59 AM Mike Karels wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2024, at 7:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>
> > On 11/01/2024 09:54, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:36:24 +0100
> >> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >>> There's one possibility which nobody talked about ye
Rodney W. Grimes wrote on
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:15:19 UTC :
> > Am 2024-01-10 22:49, schrieb Mark Millard:
> >
> > > I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never
> > > propose
> > > changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid:
> >
> > [good poi
10 matches
Mail list logo