Re: e179d973 insta-panics in nl_send_one()

2024-01-08 Thread Jakob Alvermark
On 1/6/24 23:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Addendum: I have only installed the new kernel, userland is still from dec18. (Even if that is the cause, we should not panic on bad syscall args.) Poul-Henning Kamp writes: With fresh current: commit e179d9739b1438ae9acb958f80a983eff7e

Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Christian Weisgerber
We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the device nodes) in a port, security/u2f-devd? Can't we just add this to base, too? It's just another devd configuration file. -- Christia

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55 AM Christian Weisgerber wrote: > We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. > > We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. > > Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the device nodes) > in a port, security/u2f-devd? Can't we just add this t

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber > wrote: > > > We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. > > > > We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. > > > > Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Kyle Evans
On 1/8/24 10:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber wrote: We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. Why do we keep the devd configurati

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread David Chisnall
On 8 Jan 2024, at 16:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly than > in base, I think. We push out a new release of each of the -STABLE branches every 6 months and can do ENs if a product ships and becomes popular in under six months. This

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:19 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55 AM Christian Weisgerber > wrote: > >> We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. >> >> We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. >> >> Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the devic

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:35:03 -0600 Kyle Evans wrote: > On 1/8/24 10:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber > >> wrote: > >> > >>> We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. > >>> > >>> We als

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:35 AM Kyle Evans wrote: > On 1/8/24 10:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber > >> wrote: > >> > >>> We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. > >>> > >>> We also ha

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:30 AM Xin LI wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:19 AM Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55 AM Christian Weisgerber >> wrote: >> >>> We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. >>> >>> We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. >>> >>> Wh

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:37 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:35 AM Kyle Evans wrote: > >> On 1/8/24 10:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: >> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 >> > Warner Losh wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber >> >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: Move u2f-devd into base?

2024-01-08 Thread Mark Millard
David Chisnall wrote on Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 17:12:06 UTC : > On 8 Jan 2024, at 16:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > > > So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly than > > in base, I think. > > We push out a new release of each of the -STABLE branches every 6 months https

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-08 Thread Xin LI
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote: > Hi, > > Does /var/mail still need atime? > > I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on > rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime, > will it have consequences for /var/mail ? It doesn't matter if you d

Re: route ipv6 errors on bootup in -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on arm64

2024-01-08 Thread Enji Cooper
> On Jan 7, 2024, at 6:29 AM, void wrote: > > Hi, > > on a rpi4/8GB, my rc.conf looks like so. It's an ipv4-only system on a LAN > not directly connected to the internet > > hostname="generic.home.arpa" > ifconfig_genet0="inet 192.168.1.199 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:41 PM Xin LI wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does /var/mail still need atime? >> >> I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on >> rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime, >> will it h

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-08 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:12:06 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:41 PM Xin LI wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Does /var/mail still need atime? > >> > >> I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on > >>

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-08 Thread robert
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, at 14:41, Xin LI wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does /var/mail still need atime? >> >> I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on >> rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime, >> will it h