Re: ports-mgmt/portconf – not src.conf(5) – to specify multiple flavours of a port for buildkernel purposes

On 22/08/2023 06:42, Graham Perrin wrote: … % cat /usr/local/etc/ports.conf graphics/gpu-firmware-radeon-kmod: FLAVORS=btc sumo turks % Still, there's guesswork. I have /no/ idea whether the FLAVORS part of that last line is valid :-) Time will tell. /me tails /var/log/buildkernel.log, ro

Re: ZFS deadlock in 14

Hi Alexander, as 15107 is a prerequisite for 15122, would it be possible to have https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15107 merged into the OpenZFS zfs-2.2-release branch (and of course later 15122)? If the patches help I can cherry-pick them into main. Cheers, mm Alexander Motin wrote:

Re: building with llvm16 pkg fails in tests

On 8/19/23 22:28, Ronald Klop wrote: On 8/17/23 21:33, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:45:06PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, To save time on my Raspberry Pi I would like to build FreeBSD using a llvm pkg instead of llvm in the tree. My /etc/make.conf: WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes LD=

7addfafe73e0 early boot kernel panics

I could not get 7addfafe73e0 to boot. (2023-08-21, 21 hours ago). I reverted to a edacf4b4824a boot environment, which is fine. Should I simply update to ? Assuming a known issue with 7addfafe73e0

Re: 7addfafe73e0 early boot kernel panics

> On 22 Aug 2023, at 16:30, Graham Perrin wrote: > > I could not get 7addfafe73e0 to boot. > > (2023-08-21, 21 > hours ago). > > I reverted to a edacf4b4824a boot environment, which is fine. > > Should I simply update to ? > Assu

Re: 7addfafe73e0 early boot kernel panics

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:52 PM Juraj Lutter wrote: > > > > On 22 Aug 2023, at 16:30, Graham Perrin wrote: > > > > I could not get 7addfafe73e0 to boot. > > > > > (2023-08-21, 21 hours ago). > > > > I reverted to a edacf4b4824a boot en

Re: ZFS deadlock in 14

Hi Martin, I am waiting for final test results from George Wilson and then will request quick merge of both to zfs-2.2-release branch. Unfortunately there are still not many reviewers for the PR, since the code is not trivial, but at least with the test reports Brian Behlendorf and Mark Mayb

Re: src.conf(5) to specify multiple flavours of a port

> On Aug 21, 2023, at 10:01 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2023, at 9:24 PM, Graham Perrin wrote: >> >> In a thread elsewhere, as an example that did not involve src.conf, Mark >> Johnston wrote: >> >>> $ cd /usr/ports/graphics/gpu-firmware-intel-kmod >>> $ sudo make reinstall FLAVOR=k

Re: src.conf(5) to specify multiple flavours of a port

> On Aug 21, 2023, at 9:34 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 10:24 PM Graham Perrin > wrote: >> In a thread elsewhere, as an example that did not involve src.conf, Mark >> Johnston wrote: >> >>> $ cd /usr/ports/graphics/gpu-firmware-intel-kmod >>>

Re: Speed improvements in ZFS

On 8/22/23, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Am 2023-08-21 10:53, schrieb Konstantin Belousov: >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:19:28AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> Am 2023-08-20 23:17, schrieb Konstantin Belousov: >>> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:07:08PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >>> > > On 8

Re: Question about KBI change / new feature

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:42 AM Zhenlei Huang wrote: > Hi, > > The https://www.freebsd.org/releases/14.0R/schedule/ says CURRENT/14 's > KBI is froze > and new features should be avoided. > > I'm working on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39638 (sysctl(9): Enable vnet > sysctl variables be loader tu

Re: ZFS deadlock in 14

Alexander Motin wrote on Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:18:12 UTC : > I am waiting for final test results from George Wilson and then will > request quick merge of both to zfs-2.2-release branch. Unfortunately > there are still not many reviewers for the PR, since the code is not > trivial, but at

273297 – BOOT time panic after preloading TSLOG data (was: 7addfafe73e0 early boot kernel panics)

Thanks, people. I couldn't attach a photograph to the opening post (entire emails, not just attachments, disappear in the ether). Instead, a photo here:

Re: ps(1) bugs and problems

On 2023-08-15 13:28:07, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: The old -d and the new -D'$^' would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was and -D would provide the much needed feature in two variants (possibly more in the future, if needed) while only taking one option-letter. The only problem is

Re: etcupdate -B, /.cshrc and /.profile

Graham Perrin wrote: > If I recall correctly, a few hours ago etcupdate -B resulted in removal > of two files: > > /.cshrc > /.profile > > Is this degree of checking/removal a novelty? > > (I can't recall the files' contents, or when I created them. I guess > that I carelessly created them as d

Re: etcupdate -B, /.cshrc and /.profile

Mike Karels wrote: > Both sets have been present since 4.3-Reno in 1990, although they were > apparently not links. Well before my time! > > > Removing them both is one of the first things I do when I install a new > > system from install-media. > > Why? Because I don't use them > > If etcupda

Re: etcupdate -B, /.cshrc and /.profile

on why removing those, i for example only use /etc/csh.cshrc so i don't need others

Re: etcupdate -B, /.cshrc and /.profile

Sulev-Madis Silber wrote: > on why removing those, i for example only use /etc/csh.cshrc so i don't need > others Exactly the same here!