On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:52 AM John Baldwin wrote:
On 11/24/21 3:30 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
673 ===> usr.bin/diff/tests (cleandir)
674 ===> lib/geom (cleandir)
675 ===> sbin/mount_udf (cleandir)
676 make[6] warning: /lib
John-Mark Gurney wrote this message on Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 15:43 -0800:
> David Chisnall wrote this message on Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:34 +:
> > On 02/12/2021 09:51, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > Apparently the "block runtime" is supposed to provide the actual object,
> > > so I guess you have t
What to do about tgammal?
A long time ago (2013-09-06), theraven@ committed a kludge that mapped
several missing long double math functions to double math functions
(e.g., tanhl(x) was mapped to tanh(x)). Over the next few years, I
(along with bde and das reviews) provided Intel 80-bit (ld80) and
On 12/4/21 19:53, Steve Kargl wrote:
What to do about tgammal?
A long time ago (2013-09-06), theraven@ committed a kludge that mapped
several missing long double math functions to double math functions
(e.g., tanhl(x) was mapped to tanh(x)). Over the next few years, I
(along with bde and das re
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 08:40:56PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 12/4/21 19:53, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > What to do about tgammal?
(trim some history)
> >
> >Interval | Max ULP
> > ---+
> > [6,171] | 1340542.2
> > [1.0662,6]|
> On 4 Dec 2021, at 18:53, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
>
> So, is anyone interested in seeing a massive patch?
Me, please!
M
--
Mark R V Murray
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:48:13PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Dec 2021, at 18:53, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, is anyone interested in seeing a massive patch?
>
> Me, please!
>
It is ld80 only. ld128 is still broken. I'll clean things
up and create a diff over the n
