Re: OpenSSH issue: 14-Current rejects non-publickey scp/ssh/rsync connectiosn all of the sudden

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 19:37:39 -0400 Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 15:18, FreeBSD User wrote: > > > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 89: Unsupported option UsePAM > > Sorry, it turns out I had the wrong version of config.h in my commit. > > I'm running a build now and will commit it once

Re: error installing stand/i386/loader_4th in HEAD

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:37:30 -0600 Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021, 10:03 AM Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:07:08 -0600 > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021, 7:11 AM Gary Jennejohn > > wrote: > > > > > > > I got a very strange error while try

compile failure in /usr/src/stand/libsa

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
So, a new problem with buildworld in HEAD. Building in /usr/src/stand/libsa fails because dosfs.c, ufs.c and geli/gelidev.c can't find disk.h. But disk.h is located in ../common. I had to modify all three of these files to get the compile to finish by using ../common/disk.h. In /usr/src/stand/d

Re: OpenSSH issue: 14-Current rejects non-publickey scp/ssh/rsync connectiosn all of the sudden

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:29:46 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 19:37:39 -0400 > Ed Maste wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 15:18, FreeBSD User wrote: > > > > > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 89: Unsupported option UsePAM > > > > Sorry, it turns out I had the wrong version

Re: compile failure in /usr/src/stand/libsa

2021-09-10 Thread Toomas Soome via current
> On 10. Sep 2021, at 13:53, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > So, a new problem with buildworld in HEAD. > > Building in /usr/src/stand/libsa fails because dosfs.c, ufs.c and > geli/gelidev.c can't find disk.h. But disk.h is located in ../common. > > I had to modify all three of these files to get

Re: OpenSSH issue: 14-Current rejects non-publickey scp/ssh/rsync connectiosn all of the sudden

2021-09-10 Thread Ed Maste
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 04:29, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Was the config.h in the patch the same as the one you committed? No it wasn't - USE_PAM was #defined in config.h after applying the patch, while the committed version accidentally did not.