On 25/08/2021 22:19, Alan Somers wrote:
We usually try to maintain backwards compatibility forever. But is that
necessary for the ses(4) ioctls? There are several problems with them as
currently defined. They lack type safety, lack automatic copyin/copyout
handling, and one of them can overrun
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:21 AM David Chisnall wrote:
> On 25/08/2021 22:19, Alan Somers wrote:
> > We usually try to maintain backwards compatibility forever. But is that
> > necessary for the ses(4) ioctls? There are several problems with them as
> > currently defined. They lack type safety,
