Forgot to include the list. Resending.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Freddie Cash"
Date: Jan 7, 2018 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: USB stack
To: "blubee blubeeme"
Cc:
On Jan 6, 2018 8:30 PM, "blubee blubeeme" wrote:
> I just connected a Transcend StorageJet 1TB hdd not a mobile phone
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> Forgot to include the list. Resending.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Freddie Cash"
> Date: Jan 7, 2018 12:26 AM
> Subject: Re: USB stack
> To: "blubee blubeeme"
> Cc:
>
> On Jan 6, 2018 8:30 PM, "blubee blubeeme" wrot
blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com wrote on
Wed Jan 3 10:31:56 UTC 2018 :
> Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices?
>
> Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes per
> second which seems odd.
FreeBSD machine: Pine64+ 2GB? Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com wrote on
> Wed Jan 3 10:31:56 UTC 2018 :
>
> > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices?
> >
> > Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes per
> > second which see
[The following notes a problem with how a test was done.
I omit the rest of the material.]
On 2018-Jan-7, at 2:09 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
. . .
> This is a larger file, not the largest but hey
>
> L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/wd/s kBps ms/d
> %busy Name
>
Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100
"O. Hartmann" schrieb:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
> > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:41 PM, O. Hartmann
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On most recent CURRENT I face th
[I add an example of a none-USB to USB2 copy and
a USB2 to non-USB copy. They do not show any
< 8 MiByte/s bottlenecks.]
On 2018-Jan-7, at 3:42 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [The other numbers show lots of delete activity on nvd0,
> not just primarily reads. Also: Can you test a different
> USB devi
[The other numbers show lots of delete activity on nvd0,
not just primarily reads. Also: Can you test a different
USB device, such as a USB SSD stick?]
On 2018-Jan-7, at 2:44 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [The following notes a problem with how a test was done.
> I omit the rest of the material.]
>
This looks the same as what I experienced. It will be fixed by upgrading
until at least this commit:
http://www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/svnews/index.py?r=326343
Ronald.
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:50:23 +0100, Chris H wrote:
I'm running on r326056, and periodic(8) doesn't seem to be working
a
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I add an example of a none-USB to USB2 copy and
> a USB2 to non-USB copy. They do not show any
> < 8 MiByte/s bottlenecks.]
>
> On 2018-Jan-7, at 3:42 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > [The other numbers show lots of delete activity on nvd0,
> >
On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I ran this test and here's some results.
> gstat -pd images:
>
> 18GB file from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com/a/7iHwv
> 18GB file from laptop to ssd: https://imgur.com/a/40Q6V
> multiple small files from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com
Hi guys,
I have 2 small virtual machines running in data center, on similar
hardware. Both are running FreeBSD 12-current. The first one is based
on a 10.3 image, upgraded to current. The second one is based on 11.1,
upgraded to current.
I notice a difference in disk partitioning. 10.3 is using G
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 18:58 +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have 2 small virtual machines running in data center, on similar
> hardware. Both are running FreeBSD 12-current. The first one is based
> on a 10.3 image, upgraded to current. The second one is based on
> 11.1,
> upgrade
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
>
> > I ran this test and here's some results.
> > gstat -pd images:
> >
> > 18GB file from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com/a/7iHwv
> > 18GB file from laptop to ssd: https://imgur.com/a/4
I'm curious why the new console driver vt doesn't have a vesa driver when
the traditional syscons driver did.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons
Is there any specific reason why vesa driver wasn't implemented?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2018-Jan-7, at 10:23 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jan-7, at 7:50 AM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
>>
>> > I ran this test and here's some results.
>> > gstat -pd images:
>> >
>> > 18GB file from laptop to phone: https://imgur.com
> On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Running carbon 5th gen I can't call my setup a success. Wireless iwm
> doesn't support even N and AC is not supported at all. The wifi is much
> slower then on my old machines. I
On 7. Jan 2018, at 21:32, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>>
>>
On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote:
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
Hi,
>>>
>>> Running carbon 5th gen I can't call my setup a success. Wireless iwm
>>> doesn't support even N and AC
On 7. Jan 2018, at 22:40, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7. Jan 2018, at 21:32, Rodney W. Grimes
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 7. Jan 2018, at 20:43, clutton wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:58 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Running carbon 5t
> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, blubee blubeeme
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I ask does FreeBSD usb stack actually implements USB spec 2.0 or greater
>>> and the topic gets derailed
> On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, blubee blubeeme
>>> wrote:
>>>
I ask does FreeBSD usb stack actually i
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:34 +0100 "O. Hartmann" said
Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100
"O. Hartmann" schrieb:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
> > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:41 PM, O. Hartmann
> wrot
On Sun, 07 Jan 2018 14:13:01 +0100 "Ronald Klop" said
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:50:23 +0100, Chris H wrote:
> I'm running on r326056, and periodic(8) doesn't seem to be working
> as expected;
> mail rejects:
>
> Checking for rejected mail hosts:
> usage: fetch [-146AadFlMmnPpqRrsUv] [-B bytes] [
1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
logged to files (per example in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast
majority of systems' reporting is ignored :)
At least now it could be
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:34 +0100 "O. Hartmann" said
Am Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:14:47 +0100
"O. Hartmann" schrieb:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:10:37 +0100
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
> > > On 31. Dec 2017, at 02:45, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:41 PM, O. Hartmann
> wrot
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jon Brawn wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM, blubee b
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 23:05:44 -0500 said
1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
logged to files (per example in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast
majority of systems' reportin
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:17:22 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jon Brawn wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 7, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jon Brawn wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:18 PM, blubee blubeeme
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
We have a bunch of CURRENT boxes running poudriere jails providing packages for
11.1-RELENG. Since a couple of week sfor now, I face this error when I try to
update the p3 and p4 to the recent p6:
[...]
cc -O2 -pipe
-I/pool/poudriere/jails/11amd64/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint/../lint1
-DPREFIX=\"\"
Does building -DWITHOUT_LINT work? Or linking lint to /bin/true
Warner
On Jan 7, 2018 11:58 PM, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> We have a bunch of CURRENT boxes running poudriere jails providing
> packages for
> 11.1-RELENG. Since a couple of week sfor now, I face this error when I try
> to
> update the
[The involvement of sysutils/fusefs-simple-mtpfs
and sysutils/fusefs-libs and multimedia/libmtp
in order to use the Media Transfer Protocol (MTP)
against the LG v30 likely explains much of the
performance difference vs. local UFS file
systems. I provide some related notes.]
blubee blubeeme gurench
Put the following in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/src.conf:
LINT=/usr/bin/false
That skips the attempt to build the lint library because of this:
.if ${LINT} == "lint"
_llib= llib
.else
_llib=
.endif
SUBDIR= lint1 lint2 xlint ${_llib}
in /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/Makefile
On 8 Jan, O
There doesn't appear to be a knob to disable building lint for FreeBSD
11.x. Linking or copying /usr/bin/true to /usr/bin/lint works for cross
building 11 on on a 12.0-CURRENT machine, but I was not able to get it
to work when rebuilding a poudriere jail.
On 8 Jan, Warner Losh wrote:
> Does buil
33 matches
Mail list logo
