When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using FreeBSD
base, it
seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD world
uses x86:64,
FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used inconsistently all over the places?
I run into trouble setting up some pac
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:51:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using FreeBSD
> base, it
> seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD world
> uses x86:64,
> FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used incon
Hi!
> When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64.
Where do you get that value from ? If I access a repo,
I access e.g.
https://repo.opsec.eu/${ABI}
and ABI maps to
FreeBSD:12:amd64
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Am Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:08:53 +0200
Kurt Jaeger schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> > When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64.
As I wrote: poudriere repo.
>
> Where do you get that value from ? If I access a repo,
> I access e.g.
>
> https://repo.opsec.eu/${ABI}
>
> and ABI maps to
>
> Fr
Our 10.4 system is using gcc (for now).
when we compile the devel/binutils port, we get a failure with a bunch
of these errors:
`_ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableILi64ELb1EEE' referenced in section
`.rodata' of aarch64.o: defined in discarded section
`.rodata._ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableIL
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 00:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Our 10.4 system is using gcc (for now).
>
> when we compile the devel/binutils port, we get a failure with a
> bunch
> of these errors:
>
>
> `_ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableILi64ELb1EEE' referenced in section
> `.rodata' of aarch64.o
On 4/10/17 12:56 am, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 00:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Our 10.4 system is using gcc (for now).
when we compile the devel/binutils port, we get a failure with a
bunch
of these errors:
`_ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableILi64ELb1EEE' referenced in section
Hi,
I accidentially ordered a Sata SSD disk which diskinfo reports a
sector-size 4K instead of 512 bytes. Trying to get it to boot under
FreeBSD appeared impossible. Then I started looking into the boot0,1,2
and loader and the assumptions they make about 512 byte sector size LBA :-(
Anyone h
On 10/03/2017 17:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I accidentially ordered a Sata SSD disk which diskinfo reports a
> sector-size 4K instead of 512 bytes. Trying to get it to boot under
> FreeBSD appeared impossible. Then I started looking into the boot0,1,2
> and loader and the assumptions
> On 4 Oct 2017, at 00:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I accidentially ordered a Sata SSD disk which diskinfo reports a sector-size
> 4K instead of 512 bytes. Trying to get it to boot under FreeBSD appeared
> impossible. Then I started looking into the boot0,1,2 and loader and the
10 matches
Mail list logo
