> On 05 Oct 2016, at 15:01, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> On 05/10/2016 14:19, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>> ig4iic_start is called, but iicbus_hinted_child, isl_probe, iicbus_probe and
>> iicbus_attach are not.
>
> Thank you!
> Now I think I see where I made a silly mistake.
> Please try an updated
On 06/10/2016 10:08, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
>> On 05 Oct 2016, at 15:01, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/10/2016 14:19, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>>
>>> ig4iic_start is called, but iicbus_hinted_child, isl_probe, iicbus_probe and
>>> iicbus_attach are not.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Now I think I see
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:47:48PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Today, I checked on two servers of ours running both a recent CURRENT (i.e.
> FreeBSD
> 12.0-CURRENT #43 r306701: Wed Oct 5 06:40:40 CEST 2016) via "service netif
> restart" the
> upcoming network and realised that the default rou
On 06/10/2016 10:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 10:08, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 05 Oct 2016, at 15:01, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
On 05/10/2016 14:19, Michael Gmelin wrote:
ig4iic_start is called, but iicbus_hinted_child, isl_probe, iicbus_probe
and
iicbus
On 06/10/2016 08:37, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> The more testing the better!
Based on Michael's results I've uploaded a new version:
https://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ig4-i2c.v4.diff
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.f
> On 06 Oct 2016, at 09:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2016 08:37, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> The more testing the better!
>
> Based on Michael's results I've uploaded a new version:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ig4-i2c.v4.diff
>
>
Good news. Applying the last two fixes manually, is
On 06/10/2016 11:10, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
>> On 06 Oct 2016, at 09:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/10/2016 08:37, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> The more testing the better!
>>
>> Based on Michael's results I've uploaded a new version:
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ig4-i2c.v4.diff
>>
>>
I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB
implementations and running into failures when trying to apply large
diffs. This is causing phabricator reviews to be unuseable as well.
I've setup two trees to test this. The first tree is used to generate
the diff and the secon
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:27:53 +0200
Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:47:48PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > Today, I checked on two servers of ours running both a recent
> > CURRENT (i.e. FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #43 r306701: Wed Oct 5 06:40:40
> > CEST 2016) via "service netif res
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB
> implementations and running into failures when trying to apply large
> diffs. This is causing phabricator reviews to be unuseable as well.
>
> I've setup two trees t
On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>> I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB
>> implementations and running into failures when trying to apply large
>> diffs. This is causing phabricator review
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>>> I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB
>>> implementations and running into failures when trying to
On 10/06/16 09:00, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB
impleme
On 10/06/16 09:19, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/16 09:00, Alan Somers wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I'm doing a large amount of
On 10/6/16 12:27 AM, Oliver Peter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:47:48PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Today, I checked on two servers of ours running both a recent CURRENT (i.e.
FreeBSD
12.0-CURRENT #43 r306701: Wed Oct 5 06:40:40 CEST 2016) via "service netif
restart" the
upcoming network
On 06 Oct 2016, at 17:23, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> On 10/06/16 09:19, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/16 09:00, Alan Somers wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bru
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:12:27 +0300
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 11:10, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 06 Oct 2016, at 09:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06/10/2016 08:37, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> The more testing the better!
> >>
> >> Based on Michael's results I've u
As many of you are aware, 11.0-RELEASE needed to be rebuilt to address
several issues that were discovered after the release was built. Extra
caution is being taken in testing the rebuilt releases, so at present,
the final release announcement is planned for Monday, October 10.
Thank you for your
On 10/06/16 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 06 Oct 2016, at 17:23, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/16 09:19, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/16 09:00, Alan Somers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> On 10/06/16 08:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 09:40, Pete Wright wrote:
>
>> On 10/6/16 12:27 AM, Oliver Peter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:47:48PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Today, I checked on two servers of ours running both a recent CURRENT (i.e.
>>> FreeBSD
>>> 12.0-CURRENT #43 r306701: Wed Oct 5
20 matches
Mail list logo
