On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:28:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 10.07.2016 18:13, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >> On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >>>
> On 10.0
Is the following something that should be updated something like is indicated
below for 11.0-BETA1? Is kboot powerpc64 specific?
# svnlite diff /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile
Index: /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile
===
--- /usr
It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit
and 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point
and were for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you
do a test build with the -CFLAGS+= -Wa,-mppc64bridge line removed?
-Nathan
On
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #3556 - Failure:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3556/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3556/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3556/console
Change summaries:
3
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> > Under BSD-like license.
> > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> > And can be GOST en
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #3557 - Fixed:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3557/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3557/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/3557/console
Change summaries:
302
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> Under BSD-like license.
> Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> And can be GOST enabled now?
>
I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need
Hi!
> > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> > Under BSD-like license.
> > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> > And can be GOST enabled now?
> I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need to focus
> on decoupling openssl from base so this
On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>
>>> I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
>>> Under BSD-like license.
>>> Can be this engine import in base syste
On 07/10/16 09:30 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released?
It works for me, I think. The following change was all I need to enable
the engine:
--- /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf.orig
+++ /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
@@ -13,6 +
On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and
> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were
> for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test
> build
On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
>> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released?
>
> AFAIK openssl maintainers says something like they can't support this
> code and it will become rott
On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>
>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and
>> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were
>> for compatibility with pre
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
> >> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released?
> >
> > AFAIK openssl maintainers
On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>>
>>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and
>>> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obs
On 07/11/16 02:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
Can be this enabled befo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 07/11/16 02:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am sur
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I.e. GOST will be available in
Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds
for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They had
analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64)
produced.
I do not have a context to test powerpc64 or powerpc kbo
Hi,
Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r.
The bootonly iso (281MB) burns and runs ok.
Regards,
Ronald.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing lis
On 2016-Jul-11, at 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds
> for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They
> had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64)
> produced.
DVD-R dates to 1997; cheap USB flash devices are now pervasive. Maybe
it's time to move on from CD.
Best,
Conrad
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
> Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too bi
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
>> Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r.
>>
>> The bootonly iso (281MB) burns and runs ok.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ronald.
Please open
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
> >> Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r.
> >>
> >> The boo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
> > >> Windows 10. I
Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r.
The bootonly iso
On 11.07.2016 23:13, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
>> On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenko
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop
> > > wrote: >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Just downloade
On 2016-07-11 18:33, Chris H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop
wrote: >> Hi,
Just downl
On 11.07.2016 21:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
Can be this enabled befor
On 12.07.2016 1:44, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 11.07.2016 21:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am surprised lack of support GOST
On 11/07/2016 23:39, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-07-11 18:33, Chris H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov
wrote
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 P
You don't need that much for OS really if you compress the underlying FS
(be that ISO9660 or UFS) with the mkuzip. Just as an extreme example of
that, we have liveCD-type image that deals with provisioning a new systems
and troubleshooting issues on around 40MB ISO. That includes nearly all of
the
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:39:51 -0400 Allan Jude wrote
> On 2016-07-11 18:33, Chris H wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov
> > wrote >
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote
P.S. Just in case if somebody wants to integrate this method into FreeBSD
liveCD build, we do a bit of trick there by making normal ISO9660 file
system with compressed kernel and relevant boot pieces and then also
sticking in BSD label on the same disk image. It turns out ISO9660 and BSD
disklabel
Hi,
It seems to be possible for ptrace(PT_ATTACH) to race with the delivery
of a signal to the same process. ptrace(PT_ATTACH) sets P_TRACED and
sends SIGSTOP to a thread in the target process. Consider the case where
a signal is delivered to a second thread, and both threads are executing
ast() c
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2016-July/088998.html shows:
> Modified: head/sys/arm/include/_types.h
> ==
> --- head/sys/arm/include/_types.h Mon Jul 11 23:15:54 2016
> (r302600)
> +++ head/sy
On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote:
> My understanding of the criteria for __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX:
>
> A) __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: same type as the integer promotion of
> ___wchar_t (if that is distinct).
> B) __WCHAR_MIN is the low value for ___wchar_t as an integer type; not
> neces
38 matches
Mail list logo
