Hi,
I compared the output of "locale -a" from a CURRENT system built
a few days ago, to the latest build. The latest build still has some
missing locales,
af_ZA.ISO8859-15
en_AU.ISO8859-15
en_CA.ISO8859-15
en_NZ.ISO8859-15
en_US.ISO8859-15
fr_CA.ISO8859-15
lt_LT.ISO8859-4
sr_YU.ISO8859-2
sr_YU.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:09:01AM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I compared the output of "locale -a" from a CURRENT system built
> a few days ago, to the latest build. The latest build still has some
> missing locales,
>
>
> af_ZA.ISO8859-15
> en_AU.ISO8859-15
> en_CA.ISO8859-15
> en
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:22:26AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:14:36 +0100
> "O. Hartmann" schrieb:
>
> > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:59:54 -0800
> > Craig Rodrigues schrieb:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:57 PM, NGie Cooper
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > install
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:09:01AM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I compared the output of "locale -a" from a CURRENT system built
> > a few days ago, to the latest build. The latest build still has some
> > missing loc
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1696 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1696/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1696/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1696/console
Change su
Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:28:03 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin schrieb:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:22:26AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:14:36 +0100
> > "O. Hartmann" schrieb:
> >
> > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:59:54 -0800
> > > Craig Rodrigues schrieb:
> > >
> > > > On Sun,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:35:34AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:28:03 +0100
> Baptiste Daroussin schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:22:26AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:14:36 +0100
> > > "O. Hartmann" schrieb:
> > >
> > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov
On 15/11/15 13:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
2. I have seen the idea that this makes the information dumped by utilities in
the base easily accessible programatically. OK, maybe it does , but
it doesn't fit with the current paradigm of "tool | filter | tool” at all.
There are no tools able to accep
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1697 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1697/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1697/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1697/console
Change su
On 2015-11-15 14:44, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> I would welcome competing ideas/solutions, but someone would have to
>> actually build them, not just
>
>> rattle off some ideas on the mailing list.
>
> Am I missing the point of a mailing list ? it is a place to present and
> exchange ideas, ask wh
On 15/11/15 06:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in base
> and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is funny
> , but why ? “ And I couldn't find a real answer. Ill outline what I think:
>
>
> 1. U
On 2015-11-16 12:09, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 15/11/15 06:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in
>> base and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is
>> funny , but why ? “ And I couldn't find
>
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>
> (Attempted to send this yesterday, but appears it didn't go through.
> Apologies if it really did go through).
>
> As part of a project getting FreeBSD on the Freescale P5020 SoC, I increased
> the width of resources, from u_long(32
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1698 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1698/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1698/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1698/console
Change su
On 16 Nov 2015, at 17:09, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
>
> It seems to boil down to the golden rule: he who has the gold, makes the
> rules. Juniper wanted it, they're a non-trivial donor to the FreeBSD
> foundation and employ many devs, so they got their way.
>
> That's all there is to it.
I think t
> How big of a donor you are to the FreeBSD Foundation does not affect the
> committable of your code. Having code ready to commit, vs just a vague
> plan, does help your solution win out over another proposed solution though
Then surely you will salvage something from a lot of GsoCs where people
Thanks for the details Allan,
To be frank , Im not expecting any warm response. It wouldn't bother me if you
would all have answered me like rabid dogs, as long i would get answers to some
questions I have.
Libxo is not horrible per se, but adoption made me painfully aware of a deep
problem
On 16 November 2015 at 10:06, Dan Partelly wrote:
> Thanks for the details Allan,
>
> To be frank , Im not expecting any warm response. It wouldn't bother me if
> you would all have answered me like rabid dogs, as long i would get answers
> to some questions I have.
Oh, I hope you don't think
Hi Adrian,
No, no, none wasn't unwelcoming or cold. Thanks for your responses
> I plan on attacking the binary code reuse a bit by turning the
> net80211 bits of ifconfig into a library and starting to use it from
> other places
This is great news. ifconfig is an obvious target. I personally a
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1699 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1699/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1699/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1699/console
Change su
On 16 November 2015 at 12:30, Dan Partelly wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
>
> No, no, none wasn't unwelcoming or cold. Thanks for your responses
>
>> I plan on attacking the binary code reuse a bit by turning the
>> net80211 bits of ifconfig into a library and starting to use it from
>> other places
>
> T
Hey All,
I'm experiencing a buildkernel failure only when doing a multi-job build
(-jN). Doing a single-job build works fine. Below is the error I'm
getting.
Begin Log
In file included from
/usr/src/sys/modules/tests/framework/../../../tests/framework/kern_testfrwk.c:34:
/usr/src/sys/s
On 11/16/15, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm experiencing a buildkernel failure only when doing a multi-job build
> (-jN). Doing a single-job build works fine. Below is the error I'm
> getting.
>
> Begin Log
> In file included from
> /usr/src/sys/modules/tests/framework/../../../tes
First let me say that I wish I had more time to contribute to the project,
but I seem to be caught in variety of long drawn-out hassles in real-life.
Otherwise I would already know the answer to this question:
Is there some specification for what JSON is created by the various FBSD
utilities? I d
Dan Partelly wrote:
> >> The ability to get machine parsable output from OS components is a big
> >> part of the success of Junos CLI, netconf etc.
>
> Once you get machine parsable output, and feed it to your GUIs , WEB,
> other tools, and modify it, how do you feed it back to your underlying
>
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1700 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1700/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1700/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1700/console
Change su
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> >
> > (Attempted to send this yesterday, but appears it didn't go through.
> > Apologies if it really did go through).
> >
> > As part of a project getting FreeBSD on the Freescale P5020 SoC, I
On 11/15/15 10:09 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-11-15 13:06, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Nov 15, 2015, at 09:51, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 15.11.2015 20:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 15 November 2015 at 09:10, Dan Partelly wrote:
Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does th
On 11/16/15 9:39 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
How big of a donor you are to the FreeBSD Foundation does not affect the
committable of your code. Having code ready to commit, vs just a vague
plan, does help your solution win out over another proposed solution though
Then surely you will salvage som
On 11/16/15 9:16 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-11-16 12:09, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
On 15/11/15 06:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in base
and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is funny ,
but
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1701 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1701/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1701/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1701/console
Change su
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1702 - Still Unstable:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1702/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1702/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1702/console
Change su
Management daemon with fine grained permission, extremely useful. Would Juniper
consider donating to FreeBSD under a BSD license portions of this code, the
MGD, which could be reused in FreeBSD ? A fine grained permission system on
daemon IPC and the scaffoldings of a management configuration
33 matches
Mail list logo