Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r276514: lib/libpjdlog/pjdlog.c has after

On 22 Mar 2015, at 03:45, Mark Millard wrote: ... > Looking at the sources suggests that is explicitly in the #include > sequence too late to guarantee va_args a definition at the point of its use > in #include : is #include'd in pjdlog.c in the line > after #include and printf.h itself doe

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #866

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r276514: lib/libpjdlog/pjdlog.c has after

Dimitry Adnric wrote: > You should be able to include standard headers (or at least, headers in > /usr/include) in any order, and includes , which > then defines the correct types. Another of the ANSI/ISO-C rules is: You must include a standard header before you refer to anything that it offic

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Early panic at boot: exclusive sleep mutex hdac1 (HDA driver mutex) ...

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:23:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > As noted in a thread on -mobile yesterday, I'm replacing my long-serving > Dell M4400 laptop with a newer model (M4800) -- you can see -mobile > archives for additional details if you're interested. > > What prompted this note was:

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, wrote: > See > Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this? After the clang 3.6.1 import, /bin/expr behaves differently. With clang 3.5.0: # expr 4611686018427387904 + 4611686018427387904 expr: o

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Mar 22, 2015, at 14:02, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, wrote: > >> See >> > > Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this? > After the clang 3.6.1 import, /bin/expr behaves differently. > > With c

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #868

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, wrote: > >> See >> > > Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this? > After the clang 3.6.1 import, /bin/expr behaves differently. > > With

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, wrote: >> >>> See >>> >> >> Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this? >> After the

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is > indeed caused by reliance on signed integer wrapping. > > This diff should fix it, without rewriting the utility: > > Index: bin/expr/Makefile > ==

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is indeed > caused by reliance on signed integer wrapping. > > This diff should fix it, without rewriting the utili

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Mar 22, 2015, at 14:36, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is indeed >> caused by reliance on signed integer wrapping.

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is > indeed caused by reliance on signed integer wra

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues wrote: ... > OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work. > > Can you commit your patch to the Makefile? It fixes the problem for now. +1 I’d still like to know why clang 3.5 doesn’t have this behavior though — there

Re: What's the official method to test the build now?

On Mar 21, 2015, at 5:32, Ryan Stone wrote: > I still see the compile errors that I reported here: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-February/054803.html > > It affects these builds: > > sparc64 LINT kernel failed, check _.sparc64.LINT for details > powerpc LINT kern

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > ... > >> OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work. >> >> Can you commit your patch to the Makefile? It fixes the problem for now. > > +1 > > I’d still

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:09, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work. >>> >>> Can you commit your patch to the Ma

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:09, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would requ

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #867

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric >> wrote: >> > >> > Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does

Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

Hi group, New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far. Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450 with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I bought it with the hopes of running PC-BSD latest version on it. It uses intel 5500 grap

Re: Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Marek Novotny wrote: > Hi group, > > New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far. > Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450 > with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I bought it with the hopes of

Re: Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:32:06PM -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far. > Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450 > with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I bought it with the hopes of > runni

Re: Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

Thanks! Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny On 03/22/2015 04:42 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Marek Novotny wrote: Hi group, New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far. Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono

Re: Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

I have a 4th gen core i3 running PC-BSD 10.1 in which I let the installer do its thing. It uses zfs for / but it's not encrypted. It gave me the laptop's native res which I think is 1366 x 768. I have a 4th gen desktop installed the same way which is giving me 1920x1080. I'm not sure how it de

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #869

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Broadwell Support FreeBSD 10.1

What a coincidence, I'm looking at getting a Broadwell micro PC. I'm looking at this Broadwell model: http://www.gigabyte.com.au/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4888#ov At the moment, I don't mind not having X but I would like it eventually, is there any idea on when Iris Pro support would be done

Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #870

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

bsdinstall and current (possible stable) snapshots

Hi Devin, Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image ( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso) on IBM HS22 blade via bladecenter's kvm but I faced with problem on checksum stage, bootonly doesn't contain base, kernel,etc distributions but it contain manife

Re: bsdinstall and current (possible stable) snapshots

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:47:38 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > Hi Devin, > > Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image > ( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso) > on IBM HS22 blade via bladecenter's kvm but I faced with problem on checksum > stage, b

Re: bsdinstall and current (possible stable) snapshots

On 2015-03-23 01:52, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:47:38 +0300 > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > >> Hi Devin, >> >> Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image >> ( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso) >> on IBM HS22 blade via bladecente