On 9/1/14, 7:59 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and
operations
department
You work for the same company as me?
in a past life, they were a customer.
some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 30
On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in
business is
that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your
choice.
The custommers require it..
You should try arguing wit
On 2 September 2014 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Andrew Berg wrote:
> > On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> >
> >> That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly
> >> broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL
> >> shouldn't be an EOL
Alban Hertroys :
On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in
business is
that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not a
On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
>>
>> On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>
>>> sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in
>>> business is
>>> that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not al
Marcus von Appen wrote:
> Alban Hertroys :
>
>>
>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand
>> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but
>> software vendors aren't that quick. For many
On 2 Sep 2014, at 12:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> I'm not happy that the EOL was
> not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline.
I'm not sure what you think the difference is. The EOL says 'the FreeBSD
project no longer supports this configuration'. If you are not relying on us
for s
On 9/1/2014 9:27 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke
> shit... (badly) ...
What broke? I am not aware of any new regressions in 1.3.7.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues
> in the time between tthe announcement and now
>
If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has
apparently never before been used in an enter
Brandon Allbery :
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues
in the time between tthe announcement and now
If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has
apparently never before bee
Dear FreeBSD Community,
The deadline for the next FreeBSD Quarterly Status update is October 7,
for work done in July through September.
Status report submissions do not have to be very long. They may be
about anything happening in the FreeBSD project and community, and
provide a great way to in
Thank you!
The attached patch to sys/kern/uipc_socket.c worked.
I will file a bug report later.
2014-09-02 9:49 GMT+09:00 Garrett Cooper :
> Is bpf built into the kernel, or is it built and loaded as a module. I'm
> wondering because an issue with vimage and socket "hook" support was resolved
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
> Marcus von Appen wrote:
>> Alban Hertroys :
>>
>>>
>>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
>>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand
>>> that you think 2 years is enough time to sh
Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Marcus von Appen wrote:
>>
>>> Alban Hertroys :
>>>
>>>
I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand
th
Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan
> wrote:
>
>
>> This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my
>> build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically
>> converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continu
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan
wrote:
> This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my
> build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically
> converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued...
> however I now have a repo th
Hi all,
I've completed a significant enhancement to bsdinstall's distextract.
Current code:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/distextract/
Proposed Patch:
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download/dpv-1.1-freebsd-head-patch-20140830.txt
NB: Proposed commit message further below (aft
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've completed a significant enhancement to bsdinstall's distextract.
Hi Devin,
Can you please post this patch up on reviews.freebsd.org?
Thanks!
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yaneurab...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:17 PM
> To: dte...@freebsd.org
> Cc: freebsd-current; Julian Elischer; Nathan Whitehorn
> Subject: Re: [CFT] Installer Enhancement -- dpv
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:11 PM,
FreeBSD FBSD11 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #47 r269949: Wed Aug 13
14:18:28 EDT 2014 root@FBSD11:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
Trying to rebuild the system at r270973
I get a kernel panic on boot. I am able to boot into kernel.old at
r269949 and the system is functional. Is a
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:18:15PM -0700, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yaneurab...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:17 PM
> > To: dte...@freebsd.org
> > Cc: freebsd-current; Julian Elischer; Nathan Whitehorn
> > Su
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:47 AM, AN wrote:
> FreeBSD FBSD11 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #47 r269949: Wed Aug 13
> 14:18:28 EDT 2014 root@FBSD11:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> Trying to rebuild the system at r270973
> I get a kernel panic on boot. I am able to boot into kernel.o
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D696
I found that the binmisc handler was not executing if the shell handler
fired. Both were using the same intepreted flag to determine if they
should run.
This change modifies struct image_params.interpreted to be a bitfield
instead of a bool flag and assigns one b
I have posted this on reviews.f.o:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D714
--
Cheers,
Devin
> -Original Message-
> From: de...@shxd.cx [mailto:de...@shxd.cx] On Behalf Of
> dte...@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:11 PM
> To: 'freebsd-current'
> Cc: dte...@freebsd.org; 'Julian E
Hi all,
on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
if anyone sees the same.
the 'ps axdl' result looks like:
http://pastebin.com/qFg5FusN
-Jia-Shiun.
___
f
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
> not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
> if anyone sees the same.
>
> the 'ps axdl' result looks like:
> http://pastebin.com/qFg5Fu
On 2 September 2014 21:17, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
> not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
> if anyone sees the same.
>
> the 'ps axdl' result looks like:
> http://pastebin.com/qFg5FusN
W
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:17:07PM +0800, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
> not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
> if anyone sees the same.
>
This is being looked into. Thank you for noticing,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:17:07 +0800
Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
> not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
> if anyone sees the same.
>
> the 'ps axdl' result looks like:
> http://pastebin.com/
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:17:07PM +0800, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on r270962 -current ps indicates all processes have ppid 1 which is
> not reasonable. This happened to me since about 1 week ago. Wondering
> if anyone sees the same.
>
> the 'ps axdl' result looks like:
> http://pastebin
30 matches
Mail list logo
