Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-08-08 Thread Ivan A. Kosarev
On 08/08/2014 09:28 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:18:12PM +0400, Ivan A. Kosarev wrote: Hello, According to libthr's thr_init.c (the 9.2 version) init_main_thread() allocates s.c. "red zone" below the main stack in order to protect other stacks. The size of the main

Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-08-08 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:32:56PM +0400, Ivan A. Kosarev wrote: > > On 08/08/2014 09:28 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:18:12PM +0400, Ivan A. Kosarev wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> According to libthr's thr_init.c (the 9.2 version) init_main_thread() > >> allocates s.

Re: r269147: NULL mp in getnewvnode() via kern_proc_filedesc_out()

2014-08-08 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 08:11:11AM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:48:28PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > On 8/5/2014 10:56 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > > On 8/5/2014 10:19 PM, Konstantin Belousov wr

Re: r269147: NULL mp in getnewvnode() via kern_proc_filedesc_out()

2014-08-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/8/2014 6:46 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 08:11:11AM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:48:28PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/5/2014 10:56 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>

poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some hours it is crashing with: # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date ... >>> Making hierarchy -- cd /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-h

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/8/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some > hours it is crashing with: > > # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date [...] > mtree: illegal option -- N > usage: mtree [-LPUcdeinqruxw] [-

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 07:12:15PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > The host where poudriere is running is: > > > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD vm-tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18 > > 12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENE

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: > Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0 > release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end > of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way. >

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > > i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update > > > the host where poudriere is running before? > > > > Yes. Go for 10.0-REL p7, then retry. > > Can you explain, why? bdrewery@ knows much more about it than I do 8-) I only know that it helps to use a recent s

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/8/2014 2:11 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: > >> Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0 >> release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end >> of 10.0 so you shoul

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures? > Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it > on the next run? Yes I agree this should probably change. I'll evaluate it after the 3.1 release which i

RE: loader lszfs command

2014-08-08 Thread dteske
> -Original Message- > From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yaneurab...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 5:10 PM > To: dte...@freebsd.org > Cc: Sean Bruno; freebsd-current > Subject: Re: loader lszfs command > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, wrote: > > > >> -Original Message--

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: > The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a > build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release > jumps are not supported. You can usually get away with a head host using >

Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes

2014-08-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/8/2014 2:42 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: > >> The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a >> build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release >> jumps are not supported.

Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

2014-08-08 Thread Daniel Peyrolon
Hello everyone, I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my machine. Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it would be more efficient, and rebooted. (I installed the system with zfs using bsdinstall). It turned out that gptzfsboot wasn't able to

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

2014-08-08 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.08.08 17:41, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > What would be the better way to avoid this happening in the future? > Always update the bootloader before doing a zpool upgrade on your root pool. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

2014-08-08 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: > Hello everyone, > > I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my > machine. > > Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it would be more > efficient, and rebooted. (I install

ddb_enable=YES doesn't reboot anymore

2014-08-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, I noticed that on panic, the default ddb script does not reboot the machine automatically anymore. It just stays at the debugger prompt. # sysctl debug.ddb.scripting.scripts debug.ddb.scripting.scripts: lockinfo=show locks; show alllocks; show lockedvnods kdb.enter.panic=capture on; run loc

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

2014-08-08 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-08-08 19:23, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my >> machine. >> >> Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it