On 21/07/2014 5:14 AM, Eric Masson wrote:
> krad writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I really like the idea of the openpf version, that has been mentioned
>> in this thread.
> It would be nice but as it's been written in this thread, Open & Free
> internals are quite different beasts, goals are different on both
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:53:56PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/22/14, 2:26 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 7/22/14, 2:07 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >> Meant to send to current@, moving there.
> >>
> >> On 7/22/14, 2:07 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >>> On r268621:
> >>>
> panic: shadowed t
Hi all,
I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0
This version is the result of almost 9 month of hard work
Here are the statistics for the version:
- 373 files changed, 66973 insertions(+), 38512 deletions(-)
- 29 different contributors
Please not that for the first time I'm not the
On 7/23/14, 7:11 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:53:56PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/22/14, 2:26 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/22/14, 2:07 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Meant to send to current@, moving there.
On 7/22/14, 2:07 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On r268621:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0
> This version is the result of almost 9 month of hard work
>
> Here are the statistics for the version:
> - 373 files changed, 66973 insertions(+), 38512 deletions(-)
> -
On 23/07/2014 19:38, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I think one bullet was a bit mangled in French->English translation,
> though. What does "The unicity of a package is not anymore origin" mean? I
> have a couple of guesses, but I am not really sure. Ithink the best
> translations would be "The unicity of
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 23/07/2014 19:38, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I think one bullet was a bit mangled in French->English translation,
> > though. What does "The unicity of a package is not anymore origin" mean?
> I
> > have a couple of guesses, but I am not
In message
, Adrian Chadd writes:
> On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote:
> > that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
> > way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either. We
> > should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of tha
In message <20381608.hhy3qfh...@overcee.wemm.org>, Peter Wemm writes:
> On Saturday 19 July 2014 13:06:52 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:22:18PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote:
> > > On 2014-07-18 15:07, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote:
> > > >> tha
In message <53ccf596.1070...@yandex.ru>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" writes:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
> --EITUmaAVUtsHLdssNwHpA0G0W8jTQ9d3L
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On 20.07.2014 18:15, Maxim Khitro
In message , Daniel
Feenberg
writes:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Lars Engels wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:18:54PM +0100, krad wrote:
> >> all of that is true, but you are missing the point. Having two versions of
> >> pf on the bsd's at the user level, is a bad thing. It confuses peo
Am 20.07.2014 18:19, schrieb Anders Bolt-Evensen:
Hello, everyone!
Last week, I created a custom ISO from the latest -CURRENT sources
which contained an EFI image that is bootable on my MacBook Pro.
Both installation and booting from this new FreeBSD 11 EFI system goes
without any problems.
How
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:42 , Cy Schubert wrote:
> Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a
> little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn't
> support it for sure. I've been told that ipfw may and I suspect ipfilter
> doesn't as it was on
On 2014-07-23 16:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:42 , Cy Schubert wrote:
>
>> Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a
>> little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn't
>> support it for sure. I've been told that ipfw m
What I did was:
Install subversion either from ports or via pkg install
Get the newest source code from FreeBSD by running the command svn
checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src (or whatever directory
you might choose, I used /usr/src)
Then I ran make buildworld from the new /usr/src
On 23 Jul 2014, at 20:41 , Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-07-23 16:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:42 , Cy Schubert wrote:
>>
>>> Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a
>>> little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn
Cy Schubert wrote:
In message <53ccf596.1070...@yandex.ru>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" writes:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--EITUmaAVUtsHLdssNwHpA0G0W8jTQ9d3L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 20.07.2014 18:15, Ma
Got the same panic, is this fix getting committed? Or has it already
been committed?
Mat
On 23/07/14 18:12, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:11 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:53:56PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/22/14, 2:26 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/22/1
Rick Macklem wrote this message on Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 16:10 -0400:
> I tried:
> m = m_getjcl(M_NOWAIT..M_JUMPAGESIZE);
> if (m == NULL)
>m = getjcl(M_WAITOK..MCLBYTES);
> when I was experimenting with MJUMPAGESIZE clusters for NFS and what happened
> was the thread looped
19 matches
Mail list logo
