gpart destroy, zpool destroy, zfs destroy under securelevel 3

2014-05-26 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Hello FreeBSD community, Recently plays with securelevel and what I discover: no chance for data to survive against remote root, except backups of course. Maybe this log can be a proposal for raising securelevel further or include securelevel support against the software which can deal with zfs

Re: Change top's notion of idle processes / threads

2014-05-26 Thread Ed Maste
On 25 May 2014 03:11, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 24/05/2014 7:22 AM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> I think this makes good sense. I would definitely prefer it. Would it >> make sense to maybe preserve the old behaviour behind a command line flag? >> > > And an update to top(8) reflecting the algo :)I know