After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216),
I got the following fatal double fault on boot:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/
My previous kernel was based on r264721.
I'm using a couple of custom patches, some of them are ZFS-related
and thus may be part
Hello list.
Looking for information about using newcons as the terminal driver in
xorg for desktop in a jail.
Can only find this https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons
Has anybody gotten it to work in a jail?
Thanks
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailin
- Original Message -
From: "Fabian Keil"
After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216),
I got the following fatal double fault on boot:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/
My previous kernel was based on r264721.
I'm using a couple of custom patc
Hi All,
The system:
-
FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #6 r265218M: Fri May 2 18:24:07 SAMT 2014
bsam@wandboard:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WANDBOARD-QUAD arm
FreeBSD clang version 3.4 (tags/RELEASE_34/final 197956) 20140216
CPU: Cortex A9-r2 rev 10 (Cortex-A core)
Supported features: ARM_ISA THUMB2 JAZELL
El día Tuesday, April 01, 2014 a las 08:38:28AM +0100, David Chisnall escribió:
>
> Just a small note here: Improving power management is something that the Core
> Team and the Foundation have jointly identified as an important goal, in
> particular for mobile / embedded scenarios. We're curre
Hi,
I'm working on adding some more power management logging support to
freebsd-head so we can start to get a better grip on sleep/wakeup
occurances. That should help us start to figure out where the power
consumption is going.
But on that EEEPC 900, just make sure you've set dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest
"Steven Hartland" wrote:
> From: "Fabian Keil"
>
> > After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216),
> > I got the following fatal double fault on boot:
> > http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/
> >
> > My previous kernel was based on r264721.
> >
> > I'm usi
"Steven Hartland" wrote:
> From: "Fabian Keil"
>
> > After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216),
> > I got the following fatal double fault on boot:
> > http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/
> >
> > My previous kernel was based on r264721.
> >
> > I'm
El día Saturday, May 03, 2014 a las 09:37:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on adding some more power management logging support to
> freebsd-head so we can start to get a better grip on sleep/wakeup
> occurances. That should help us start to figure out where the power
> co
Hi,
I updated one of my amd64 base/head VMs this afternoon.
It crashes in rt_expunge(), and I think r265279 is to blame.
If someone's interested, here's the crash report:
http://ximalas.info/~trond/amd64-head-VBOX-crash/r265283/core.txt.0
Another amd64 base/head VM I updated earlier this aftern
On 04.05.2014 00:02, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated one of my amd64 base/head VMs this afternoon.
> It crashes in rt_expunge(), and I think r265279 is to blame.
>
> If someone's interested, here's the crash report:
>
> http://ximalas.info/~trond/amd64-head-VBOX-crash/r265283/core.txt
On 04.05.2014 00:06, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 04.05.2014 00:02, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I updated one of my amd64 base/head VMs this afternoon.
>> It crashes in rt_expunge(), and I think r265279 is to blame.
>>
>> If someone's interested, here's the crash report:
>>
>> http://
Set it to the lowest available Cx state that you see in dev.cpu.0 .
-a
On 3 May 2014 12:23, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Saturday, May 03, 2014 a las 09:37:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on adding some more power management logging support to
>> freebsd-head so
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Set it to the lowest available Cx state that you see in dev.cpu.0 .
>
>
Available is not required. Set it to C8. That guarantees that you will use
the lowest available. The correct incantation in rc.conf is "Cmax".
performance_cx_lowest="Cmax"
On 05/03/14 16:59, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Set it to the lowest available Cx state that you see in dev.cpu.0 .
Available is not required. Set it to C8. That guarantees that you will use
the lowest available. The correct incantation in rc.conf
TCC is fine.
TCC for doing anything other than _thermal throttling_ these days isn't.
I've been kind of trying hard to avoid touching it as I'm worried
it'll stick to me, but something tells me i'm just going to have to
bite the bullet and grab ownership of this stuff... :(
-a
On 3 May 2014
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 05/03/14 16:59, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Set it to the lowest available Cx state that you see in dev.cpu.0 .
>>>
>>>
>>> Available is not required. Set it to C8. That guarante
Hi,
Well, hardware got better. A lot better. I'm happy to leave speedstep
and throttling in there but teach powerd about using C-states and
limited frequency stepping if it's available.
So, how about something like this:
* if C states are available - let's just use C states and not step the
cpu
On 2014-05-04 00:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, hardware got better. A lot better. I'm happy to leave speedstep
> and throttling in there but teach powerd about using C-states and
> limited frequency stepping if it's available.
>
> So, how about something like this:
>
> * if C states ar
On 3 May 2014 21:52, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-05-04 00:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well, hardware got better. A lot better. I'm happy to leave speedstep
>> and throttling in there but teach powerd about using C-states and
>> limited frequency stepping if it's available.
>>
>> So, how a
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, hardware got better. A lot better. I'm happy to leave speedstep
> and throttling in there but teach powerd about using C-states and
> limited frequency stepping if it's available.
>
> So, how about something like this:
>
> * if C
21 matches
Mail list logo