On 2013/12/20 15:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:35:37PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
I'd like to port it after finishing RT5373 driver support. :-)
Nice, looking forward to it. :)
As promised, I have committed support for the RTL8188EUS chipset.
The driver is a work in progr
Isn't the latest news that Google&co and the linux foundation setup a
construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper
funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On 25 Apr 2014, at 09:16, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
> Isn't the latest news that Google&co and the linux foundation setup a
> construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper
> funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs
Yes, there's effort to improve OpenSSL from the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Matthias Gamsjager
wrote:
> Isn't the latest news that Google&co and the linux foundation setup a
> construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper
> funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs.
It remains to be seen which of LibreSSL
Not per se more but with money it can become someones full-time job.
No sure about LibreSSL. Wouldn't it be easier and keeping in mind that
money and resources are scares in the BSD camps to use the, hopefully,
heavily funded openSSL?
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Zack Gold wrote:
> More mone
An important thing to note here is motive. The Linux Foundation is
housing this "Core Infrastructure Initiative" project, and so they are
the ones who get all the money. "The Initiative's funds will be
administered by the Linux Foundation and a steering group comprised of
backers of the project as
On 04/24/14 23:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation,
>> called LibreSSL. As
>> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the
>> code of OpenSSL, I'd
>> like to hear what the
On 2014-04-25 10:57, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 04/24/14 23:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation,
>>> called LibreSSL. As
>>> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the
>>> c
The FreeBSD Wiki at https://wiki.freebsd.org/FlattenedDeviceTree refers to
building a dtb in the following manner:
--
On platforms capable of running loader(8) the default scenario is to use
a stand-alone DTB file, which is handled by the loader and handed over to
kernel at boot time. In th
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:56 AM, Ron Brown wrote:
> The FreeBSD Wiki at https://wiki.freebsd.org/FlattenedDeviceTree refers to
> building a dtb in the following manner:
>
> --
> On platforms capable of running loader(8) the default scenario is to use
> a stand-alone DTB file, which is handled by
TB --- 2014-04-25 17:56:35 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 17:56:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:39:23 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:39:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:40:55 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:40:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
TB --- 2014-04-25 21:04:06 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 21:04:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:42:36 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 19:42:36 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
TB --- 2014-04-25 20:45:16 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-25 20:45:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:17:05AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Andriy Gapon, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I noticed that on some of our systems we were getting a clearly
> abnormal number of l2arc checksum errors accounted in l2_cksum_bad.
> [...]
> I propose the following patch which has been tested
On 2014-Apr-25 05:00:38 -0400, Zack Gold wrote:
>An important thing to note here is motive. The Linux Foundation is
>housing this "Core Infrastructure Initiative" project, and so they are
>the ones who get all the money. "The Initiative's funds will be
>administered by the Linux Foundation and a s
18 matches
Mail list logo
