Adrian Chadd writes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
Why did you rename it? The whole point of PRIVATELIB is to avoid having
to rename libraries.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-current@fre
On Friday, March 07, 2014 5:51:27 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Adrian Chadd writes:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
>
> Why did you rename it? The whole point of PRIVATELIB is to avoid having
> to rename libraries.
Because 'statfoo' is a pretty silly
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
> > > Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
> >
> > policy.
> >
> > Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security, not
> > coupling it with an eventual expiration of non-migra
On Mar 7, 2014, at 12:30 AM, David Xu wrote:
> When I am using mercurial to initialize a freebsd repository, it prints
> "warning: filename ends with '.', which is not allowed on Windows:
> 'tools/test/sort/bigtest/q-1.024.003.'
>
> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if
On 2014-03-07 09:13, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
>>>
>>> policy.
>>>
>>> Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security, not
>>> coupling it
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
>> > > Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
>> >
>> > policy.
>> >
>> > Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security,
>
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something. Same
applies for the default sha512, maybe I want to update to rounds=150
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
> wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
Is this something we want to support? NetBSD made some invasive changes on
their source tree to be able to s
On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
>> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
>> wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
>
> Is this something we want to support?
Yes.
> NetBSD made s
On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
>>> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
>>> wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
>>
>> Is t
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:19 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> > On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
> >>> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
> >>> wants to check out
On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:19 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
> it seems filename ended with a dot is il
what he said.
-a
On 7 March 2014 05:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, March 07, 2014 5:51:27 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
>>
>> Why did you rename it? The whole point of PRIVATELIB is to avo
hi all:
i am trying to compile webkit-gtk2 and stuck on error:
===
ar: warning: can't mmap file: libWebCore_la-SVGFEDisplacementMapElement.o:
Cannot allocate memory
ar: warning: can't mmap file: libWebCore_la-SVGFEDropShadowElement.o:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
>> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
>> wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
>
> Is this something we want to support?
Yes, definitely. B
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:13:30 -0500
John Baldwin wrote:
> I am assuming that an
> administrator wants the transparent upgrade (which I think is useful)
> because they are assuming that the hash algorithm is compromised or
> inferior.
I'd expect it to be done well in advance of that to give plenty o
On Friday, March 07, 2014 10:34:40 am Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
> >> > > Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to
> >> > > administrator
> >> >
> >> > policy.
> >> >
> >
Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for convenience
I used the
"workstation" predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all access of
ports via
fetch located at ftp-sites stopped passing the filter.
Even switching to "open" doesn't help and this is confusing me.
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
>>> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
>>> wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
>>
>>
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> Allan Jude wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
>> hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
>> Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something. Same
>
On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
> convenience I used the
> "workstation" predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all access of
> ports via
> fetch located at ftp-sites stopped passing the filter.
>
> Even swi
Hello,
I've written a bsnmp module to export the lm75 sensor's temperature
(and some other data) over SNMP.
With this module it is simple and easy to monitor the temperature of
rooms and other devices over the network with help of a RPi, a BBB or
others.
This is my first module for bsnmp, so i w
On Mar 7, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out fre
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:33:39 -0500
Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
> > convenience I used
> > the "workstation" predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all
> > access of ports
> > via
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something. S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> Allan Jude wrote:
>> On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
>>> Allan Jude wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
of the
On 2014-03-07 16:55, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:33:39 -0500
> Allan Jude wrote:
>
>> On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
>>> convenience I used
>>> the "workstation" predefinition of FreeBSD. But with
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
>> Allan Jude wrote:
>>> On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
> Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
> of the h
Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
> On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> >> Allan Jude wrote:
> >>> On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> Allan Jude wrote:
>
> [...]
>
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd sourc
On 2014-03-07 18:12, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows,
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
> it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 14:50, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> Xin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
>>> Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> Allan Jude wrote:
>
> [...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
>> On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2
On 7 March 2014 15:25, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
>>>
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu wrote:
>
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:43 -0800:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
> >> On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 15:25, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:36 -0800:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 03/07/14 14:50, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> > Xin Li wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
> >>> Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-03
Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
of the hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature
requ
On 2014-03-07 21:15, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:43 -0800:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>>> Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
On 2014-03
On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>> Performance for default, sha512 w/ 5k rounds:
>> AMD A10-5700 3.4GHz 3.8ms
>> AMD Opteron 4228 HE 2.8Ghz 5.4ms
>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) X5650 2.67GHz 4.0ms
>>
>> these times are aprox as the timing varies quite a bit, ~+/-10%…
And wh
41 matches
Mail list logo
