Hi all,
A HEAD@254238 kernel fails to boot in EC2 with
> panic: UMA: Increase vm.boot_pages
on 32-CPU instances. Instances with up to 16 CPUs boot fine.
I know there has been some mucking about with VM recently -- anyone want
to claim this, or should I start doing a binary search?
--
Colin Per
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Hello Brooks,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 03:01:27PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:27:44AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > > On 4/17/2013 4:14 AM, Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > > This is what I read in some
I first noticed this on my laptop on 08 Aug, after having built & booted
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #975 r253985M/253985:141: Tue Aug 6 05:28:39 PDT
2013 root@localhost:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
OK. I'm away from home, and Internet access is a bit flaky, so
initially, I suspec
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:13 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I first noticed this on my laptop on 08 Aug, after having built & booted
>
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #975 r253985M/253985:141: Tue Aug 6 05:28:39 PDT
> 2013 root@localhost:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
>
> OK. I'm away fr
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:30:15AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> ...
> > Booting...
> > GDB: no debug ports present
> > KDB: debugger backends: ddb
> > KDB: current backend: ddb
> > Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
> > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:01 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:30:15AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> ...
>> > Booting...
>> > GDB: no debug ports present
>> > KDB: debugger backends: ddb
>> > KDB: current backend: ddb
>> > Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
>> >
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system to boot,
but I don't think I did it right?
Sean
signature.a
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #78 r253966: Mon Aug 5
14:42:05 CDT 2013 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
# svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head
Relative URL: ^/head
Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/bas
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:10:55AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> ...
> OK, I'm not sure I can make an immediate guess on where's the problem
> now (without access to my main workstation), so I think you need to
> wait tomorrow unless someone beats me to the punch. The best I can say
> is that may
You need to enable PAE in the kernel to access that memory.
I could be wrong.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>
> I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
> system RAM correctly or if this is i3
Yah, I don't want to access the RAM, I just want the ridiculous box to
boot. I'm content, for this test settting, to nerf myself to 4G rams.
Sean
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 17:59 -0400, Super Bisquit wrote:
> You need to enable PAE in the kernel to access that memory.
>
> I could be wrong.
>
>
>
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 12:43 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>
> I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
> system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
>
> I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the syst
Download the source and build the PAE kernel. Do the build world.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 12:43 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
> >
> > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not n
Shigeru wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hope to use "option VIMAGE" on RaspberryPi.
>
> So, I try to make a patch.
>
> http://freebsd-current.os-hackers.jp/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/20130812/raspberry-pi/patch-vimage-r254236.diff
> #There is a SD image for RaspberryPi at sa
On 11/08/2013 16:37, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> Hail,
>
> I am back to desktoo and FreeBSD, but I cant pass the simple test to make X
> alive. Xorg -configure detects two vga and two displays, but neither seems to
> work. On 9.2rc I got to show X, but deadlock soon after. Now I installed
> head, a
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>
> I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
> system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
>
> I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system
Hi all,
From: Craig Rodrigues
Subject: Re: quick hack to support "option VIMAGE" on USB Ethernet
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:52:39 -0700
> I do not have a USB Ethernet device, and do not fully understand VIMAGE yet.
> Is your patch still necessary in CURRENT, after this patch was applied to
> subr
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 21:36 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
> >
> > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
> > system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
> >
... bug peter. And alfred. Alfred broke this stuff. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2013 21:33, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 21:36 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>> >
>> > I can neve
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:44:35PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:10:55AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > ...
> > OK, I'm not sure I can make an immediate guess on where's the problem
> > now (without access to my main workstation), so I think you need to
> > wait tomo
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:43:02PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>
> I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
> system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
>
> I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:29:44AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> ...
> The r254025 indeed introduced the problem, and Davide pointed out you a
> workaround for the assertion triggering.
Right; I tried one of those -- I hope I got it right...
> Proper fix for the memguard requires a policy o
22 matches
Mail list logo