Re: kernel compile broken in latest HEAD

2013-07-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:39:40 +0200 Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 09.07.13 22:33, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Here's what I wrote as a reference: > > ---snip--- > > Does someone know what this is supposed to result in? > > > > I would assume as the unions are unnamed and no variable is declared

Re: SVN r252892: videodev2.h update breaks gcc compilation

2013-07-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 06:59:59 -0400 Michael Butler wrote: > The recent linux header update triggers the following error: > > In file included from /usr/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c:91: > /usr/src/sys/contrib/v4l/videodev2.h:430: warning: declaration does > not declare anything Can you plea

Re: kernel compile broken in latest HEAD

2013-07-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:32:33 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I simply named them all x to get the kernel to compile, which > succeeded. I committed such a fix, can you please verify that it's ok for you? Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7

NFS panic: newnfs_copycred: negative nfsc_ngroups (client HEAD r253033, server 9.1-R)

2013-07-10 Thread Bryan Drewery
I received this panic on the client while doing heavy parallel reads/writes over NFS. I only recently moved these files to NFS, so I don't know whether or not it's a recent regression. Client: HEAD r253033 Server: 9.1-R core.txt: http://people.freebsd.org/~bdrewery/nfs.txt fstab of related paths

Re: kernel compile broken in latest HEAD

2013-07-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:43:00 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:32:33 +0200 > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > I simply named them all x to get the kernel to compile, which > > succeeded. > > I committed such a fix, can you please verify that it's ok for you? > Yup, it works

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-10 Thread Michael Grimm
Hi -- [Upcoming code freeze in stable] On 2013-04-13 22:15, Michael Grimm wrote: On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: [great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF] Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about three months I have to ask: What can I do

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-10 Thread Mark Felder
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm wrote: Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't in stable yet. I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner than later. It's so painful when someone forgets to fix the alias numbering on servers with

"Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Claude Buisson
Hi, Upgrading a CURRENT amd64 pure UFS system (watson) from r249744 to r253007, I have hit the following: claude@zorglub$ mount_nfs watson:/home /mnt claude@zorglub$ /bin/ls /mnt/ claude doc.old ports.old sysref distfiles obj portsperso xorg-dev doc

Re: "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Michael Butler
On 07/10/13 08:32, Claude Buisson wrote: > Hi, > > Upgrading a CURRENT amd64 pure UFS system (watson) from r249744 to > r253007, I have hit the following: > > claude@zorglub$ mount_nfs watson:/home /mnt > claude@zorglub$ /bin/ls /mnt/ > claude doc.old ports.old sysref > dis

Re: Improved SYN Cookies: Looking for testers

2013-07-10 Thread Fabian Keil
Andre Oppermann wrote: > We have a SYN cookie implementation for quite some time now but it > has some limitations with current realities for window scaling and > SACK encoding the in the few available bits. > > This patch updates and improves SYN cookies mainly by: > > a) encoding of MSS, WS

(follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 07/10/2013 14:32, Claude Buisson wrote: Hi, Upgrading a CURRENT amd64 pure UFS system (watson) from r249744 to r253007, I have hit the following: claude@zorglub$ mount_nfs watson:/home /mnt claude@zorglub$ /bin/ls /mnt/ claude doc.old ports.old sysref distfiles o

CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread O. Hartmann
Whe I try to compile the sources of a port in spe (devel/pocl), which is now out as RC6, I receive this error shown below: [...] ../vecmathlib/pocl/../vec_sse_double1.h:451:38: error: conversion from 'int' to 'boolvec_t' (aka 'boolvec') is ambiguous boolvec_t isinf() const { return std::isinf(v);

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread David Chisnall
Hi, On 10 Jul 2013, at 14:58, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Whe I try to compile the sources of a port in spe (devel/pocl), which > is now out as RC6, I receive this error shown below: > > [...] > ../vecmathlib/pocl/../vec_sse_double1.h:451:38: error: > conversion from 'int' to 'boolvec_t' (aka 'bo

Re: (follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello guys; Thank for finding this, however ... On 10.07.2013 08:53, Claude Buisson wrote: On 07/10/2013 14:32, Claude Buisson wrote: Hi, Upgrading a CURRENT amd64 pure UFS system (watson) from r249744 to r253007, I have hit the following: claude@zorglub$ mount_nfs watson:/home /mnt claude

Re: (follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 07/10/2013 17:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello guys; Thank for finding this, however ... While I understand this change caused the issue and I am willing to revert it, I think the problem is actually in NFS. At least ext2/3/4 and fuse (so I presume glusterfs) have unsigned i_gen. I ha

Re: (follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 10.07.2013 10:16, Claude Buisson wrote: On 07/10/2013 17:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello guys; Thank for finding this, however ... While I understand this change caused the issue and I am willing to revert it, I think the problem is actually in NFS. At least ext2/3/4 and fuse (so I pre

Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5)

2013-07-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < > trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: > > Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't >> in stable yet. >> > > I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner t

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread O. Hartmann
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:22:58 +0100 David Chisnall wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 Jul 2013, at 14:58, "O. Hartmann" > wrote: > > > > > Whe I try to compile the sources of a port in spe (devel/pocl), > > which is now out as RC6, I receive this error shown below: > > > > [...] > > ../vecmathlib/pocl/..

Re: (follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 10.07.2013 10:16, Claude Buisson wrote: On 07/10/2013 17:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello guys; Thank for finding this, however ... While I understand this change caused the issue and I am willing to revert it, I think the problem is actually in NFS. At least ext2/3/4 and fuse (so I pre

Re: Deadlock in nullfs/zfs somewhere

2013-07-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Done - http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20130710-vm0-zfs-hang.txt adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-10 15:29:52 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-10 15:29:52 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread David Chisnall
On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:33, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks for the fast response. > > The code I was told to check with is this: > > #include > #include > #include > > int > main(void) > { > >std::cout << typeid(isnan(1.0)).name() << "\n"; > > } > > > If I compile it

Re: (follow-up) "Stale NFS file handle" for NFS exported UFS from r252435

2013-07-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 07/10/2013 18:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I found a missing type change. Can you try the attached patch? SUCCESS !! Cheers, Pedro. Thanks (and apologies to rmacklem !) Claude Buisson ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread O. Hartmann
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:04:16 +0100 David Chisnall wrote: > On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:33, "O. Hartmann" > wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > thanks for the fast response. > > > > The code I was told to check with is this: > > > > #include > > #include > > #include > > > > int > > main(void) > > {

Re: Kernel crash during heavy disk access

2013-07-10 Thread Kirk McKusick
> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:29:01 -0700 > Subject: Re: Kernel crash during heavy disk access > From: Adrian Chadd > To: Benjamin Kaduk , Jeff Roberson , > Kirk McKusick > Cc: Eric Camachat , curr...@freebsd.org > > Well, best to tell kirk and jeffr. > > Jeffr wrote the journaling stuff.

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On 2013-07-10 20:32, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:04:16 +0100 > David Chisnall wrote: > >> On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:33, "O. Hartmann" >> wrote: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> thanks for the fast response. >>> >>> The code I was told to check with is this: >>> >>> #include >>> #include >>

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > I think isnan(double) and isinf(double) in math.h should only be > visible if (_BSD_VISIBLE || _XSI_VISIBLE) && __ISO_C_VISIBLE < 1999. > For C99 and higher there should only be the isnan/isinf macros. I believe you are correct. POSIX.1-2008 (which is aligned with C99) consistently cal

Re: Kernel crash during heavy disk access

2013-07-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
I still get issues with latest stable/9 and panics during or just after a bunch of disk IO. I can try to reproduce this if you'd like. -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To un

hacking - aio_sendfile()

2013-07-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hiya, I've started writing an aio_sendfile() syscall. http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20130710-aio-sendfile-3.diff Yes, the diff is against -HEAD and not stable/9. It's totally horrible, hackish and likely bad. I've only done some very, very basic testing to ensure it ac

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: < said: I think isnan(double) and isinf(double) in math.h should only be visible if (_BSD_VISIBLE || _XSI_VISIBLE) && __ISO_C_VISIBLE < 1999. For C99 and higher there should only be the isnan/isinf macros. I believe you are correct. POSIX.1-2008 (

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? adrian On 10 July 2013 21:18, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - tinderbox 2.10 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: M

Re: hacking - aio_sendfile()

2013-07-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:36:23PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hiya, > > I've started writing an aio_sendfile() syscall. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20130710-aio-sendfile-3.diff > > Yes, the diff is against -HEAD and not stable/9. > > It's