Hi,
since I upgraded away from
FreeBSD X220.ovitrap.com 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #2 r252491M:
Wed Jul 3 08:45:23 CIT 2013
to
FreeBSD X220.ovitrap.com 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #5 r253048M:
Tue Jul 9 11:21:48 CIT 2013
er...@x220.ovitrap.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X220 amd64
I
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:05:30AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Seems like the problem boils down to this:
>
> $ make -V MAKEFILE
> /usr/ports/security/vpnc/Makefile
> $ fmake -V MAKEFILE
> Makefile
>
> The only explicit assignments of MAKEFILE that I could find in ports
> infrastructure are t
On 2013-07-09 00:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Seems like the problem boils down to this:
>
> $ make -V MAKEFILE
> /usr/ports/security/vpnc/Makefile
> $ fmake -V MAKEFILE
> Makefile
>
> The only explicit assignments of MAKEFILE that I could find in ports
> infrastructure are these:
> /usr/ports/Mk/bs
on 09/07/2013 10:25 Tijl Coosemans said the following:
> On 2013-07-09 00:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Seems like the problem boils down to this:
>>
>> $ make -V MAKEFILE /usr/ports/security/vpnc/Makefile $ fmake -V MAKEFILE
>> Makefile
>>
>> The only explicit assignments of MAKEFILE that I could
On 9 Jul 2013, at 05:40, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> However, this does have an implicit redundant store,
> so changing it to
>
>ptr = func(ptr + 1);
>
> is still a good idea, just not for the reason Clang was claiming.
If the compiler can tell that ptr has not escaped, then it will elide the
r
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
C> > The BSD license allows us to put the code into FreeBSD w/o any separation.
C> >
C> > So the question is: what is more handy to us?
C> >
C> > What do we actually gain having contrib/ipf, assuming we got vendor branch
C> > already?
C
I'm making a build system for a project which creates a chroot in
which to do some of the building to avoid base-system contamination
(yeah I know lots of people do that).
the trick is that my test system is itself, a jail.
So I can not mount /dev in the chroot.
I can not predict where a build
Julian Elischer wrote
in <51dc0054.2040...@freebsd.org>:
ju> I'm making a build system for a project which creates a chroot in
ju> which to do some of the building to avoid base-system contamination
ju> (yeah I know lots of people do that).
ju> the trick is that my test system is itself, a jail
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:21:40 -0500, Julian Elischer
wrote:
seems like there should be someone out there who has hit this.. (and
solved it?)
Poudriere can itself be run in a jail... does it do hierarchical jails?
I've never tested it myself.
Bapt's loose documentation of it is here:
ht
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I think the main distinction here is whether the adaptions to
> FreeBSD are kept local (resulting in almost a fork) or are fed
> upstream so that successive updates require less or no local
> changes.
>
> Having the kernel part in sys/netp
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
...
> No, userland tools should be placed in bin|sbin|usr.bin|usr.sbin,
> according to the place where they are installed. An exlusion can be made
> adding a intermediate subdir (like this is already done for ipfilter
> tools),
> to group all r
Hi all,
I'm doing some -10 i386/amd64 package builds on a 32-core build server running:
FreeBSD vm0.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r252897:
Sat Jul 6 23:16:03 UTC 2013
sbr...@vm0.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VM0 amd64
And I hit a deadlock:
Unread portion of the kernel me
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 7/9/13 8:42 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote
in <51dc0054.2040...@freebsd.org>:
it occurs to me that the machine on which the jail is on is running 8.0
and maybe this was fixed since.. I guess I should have checked that first.
ju> I'm making a build system for a project wh
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 10:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:32:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:32:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:24:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:24:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
minutes ago:
--
>>> stage 3.2: building everything
--
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included fro
On Thursday, July 04, 2013 5:03:29 am Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > Care to provide any useful information ?
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-
handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html
>
> Well, the system doesn't deadlock it's perfectly u
On Friday, July 05, 2013 4:46:49 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Cy,
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 03:10:14PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> Unfortunately it doesn't work any more. Here is what svn spit out at me.
> C>
> C> slippy$ cd $MY_WORK_DIR/current/contrib/ipfilter
> C> slippy$ svn merge --recor
On Monday, September 24, 2012 12:37:30 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> I have a machine running "FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240887" amd64 with two
ConnectX (InfiniBand) cards. Relevant bits of dmesg and pciconf -lv below. The
cards are connected directly to a 10GB Ethernet switch so I need to run them
in
On Monday, July 08, 2013 4:41:28 am Matthias Petermann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I applied the patch, trying to get brightness controls for my X121e.
>
> But it looks like I need a different loader.conf setting.
>
> hw.pci0.0.2.0.handle="_SB_.PCI0.PEG.VID"
>
> doesn't work. In my ASl ther
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 23:05 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try doing a full, non-journal fsck.
>
> -adrian
Thank you, it fixed the problem!
Does it mean journal didn't work?
--
Eric Camachat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:15:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 13:15:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:21:36 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> > The BSD license allows us to put the code into FreeBSD w/o any
separation.
> C> >
> C> > So the question is: what is more handy to us?
> C> >
> C> > What do we actually
TB --- 2013-07-09 15:44:24 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 15:44:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 23:50:57 +0800
Alie Tan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Gary Jennejohn
> wrote:
>
> > I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
> > minutes ago:
> >
> > --
> > >>> stage 3.2: building
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
> I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
> minutes ago:
>
> --
> >>> stage 3.2: building everything
> --
TB --- 2013-07-09 14:35:25 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-09 14:35:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 9 July 2013 09:24, Eric Camachat wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 23:05 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Try doing a full, non-journal fsck.
>>
>> -adrian
>
> Thank you, it fixed the problem!
> Does it mean journal didn't work?
Yup :(
-adrian
___
Am 09.07.2013 17:56, schrieb John Baldwin:
On Monday, July 08, 2013 4:41:28 am Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hello,
I applied the patch, trying to get brightness controls for my X121e.
But it looks like I need a different loader.conf setting.
hw.pci0.0.2.0.handle="_SB_.PCI0.PEG.VID"
do
On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:58 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, September 24, 2012 12:37:30 pm John Nielsen wrote:
>> I have a machine running "FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240887" amd64 with two
> ConnectX (InfiniBand) cards. Relevant bits of dmesg and pciconf -lv below.
> The
> cards are connected
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:32:33 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
> minutes ago:
Is your cc a gcc or clang? My one is clang and I didn't get build
errors when I tested the commit. I was told there are those errors with
gcc. My question in
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:49:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
J> Let's not make ipfilter some random one-off vendor source that imports code
J> into random places. The remaining instances of that that we have (such as
J> stdtime) are a PITA to deal with.
J>
J> vendor/ipfilter == userland bits =>
On 09.07.13 22:33, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:32:33 +0200
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
>> I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
>> minutes ago:
So did I.
> Is your cc a gcc or clang? My one is clang and I didn't get build
> errors when I tested
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 9 July 2013 09:24, Eric Camachat wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 23:05 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Try doing a full, non-journal fsck.
-adrian
Thank you, it fixed the problem!
Does it mean journal didn't work?
Yup :(
So, you are going to tell
Well, best to tell kirk and jeffr.
Jeffr wrote the journaling stuff.
.. but I thought they knew there's still problems?
-adrian
On 9 July 2013 17:48, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On 9 July 2013 09:24, Eric Camachat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2013-07-08 a
TB --- 2013-07-10 03:53:35 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-07-10 03:53:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:33:56 +0200
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:32:33 +0200
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> > I just saw this breakage while compiling a kernel on HEAD updated
> > minutes ago:
>
> Is your cc a gcc or clang? My one is clang and I didn't get build
> errors when
on 09/07/2013 16:03 Adrian Chadd said the following:
> Does anyone have any ideas as to what's going on?
Please provide output of 'thread apply all bt' from kgdb, then perhaps someone
might be able to tell.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.o
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Denis D wrote:
> Hello Community,I hope someone could help me with this problem. The last days
> I have tried to find a solution, but haven't found one.The watchdog timeout
> happens, when I'm going to download something or copy a file on my FTP
> server
43 matches
Mail list logo
