On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:13:33PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
F> cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions
-Wmissing-
TB --- 2013-04-26 07:27:30 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 07:27:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hello,
would you mind running a performance test with a snapshot of tomorrow from
this link http://snapshots.pfsense.org/
There are some optimizations in pfSense and it would be nicer to compare to
FreeBSD itself how it behaves.
That is before the lock changes in HEAD since its FreeBSD 8.
Regard
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:21:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:21:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:38:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:38:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-04-26 10:27:43 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 10:27:43 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:46:13 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 09:46:13 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-04-26 10:11:25 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 10:11:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
I was having problems compiling the virtualbox guest additions on a FBSD
-current (Apr 23 20:30 EDT) system. I changed all the VM_OBJECT_LOCKs to
VM_OBJECT_WLOCKs (and same for the UNLOCKS) and added rwlock.h to the
includes. That enabled it to compile but I'm having problems getting X
started (i
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Viren Shah wrote:
> I was having problems compiling the virtualbox guest additions on a FBSD
> -current (Apr 23 20:30 EDT) system. I changed all the VM_OBJECT_LOCKs to
> VM_OBJECT_WLOCKs (and same for the UNLOCKS) and added rwlock.h to the
> includes. Tha
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:49:55AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Viren Shah wrote:
> > I was having problems compiling the virtualbox guest additions on a FBSD
> > -current (Apr 23 20:30 EDT) system. I changed all the VM_OBJECT_LOCKs to
> > VM_OBJECT_WLOCKs
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:49:55AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Viren Shah wrote:
> > > I was having problems compiling the virtualbox guest additions on a FBSD
> > > -current (Apr 23 20:30
TB --- 2013-04-26 13:20:24 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 13:20:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hi,
This breaks the ability to compile this stuff on -9.
Like, you know, a bunch of vendors tend to do.
It would have been nice for a quick review cycle when you change
network APIs like this.
Also, since you've changed an API, have you bumped FREEBSD_VERSION ?
This is why I suggested you do i
TB --- 2013-04-26 13:20:24 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 13:20:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:35AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:49:55AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Viren Shah wrote:
> > > > I was having problems compiling th
We have a problem with Intel AMT and FreeBSD. We have AMT version:
8.1.20-build 1336. AMT stop responding about five minutes after booting
FreeBSD, it's FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE, 64 bit.
On Linux AMT works fine. We suspect driver, but it's similar like on Linux.
Can you show us the way to resolve this pr
TB --- 2013-04-26 23:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 23:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-04-26 23:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-26 23:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
19 matches
Mail list logo