Trying to boot a kernel > r249381 fails and I see on the console the
loader prompt at "mountroot". Obviously, the bootloader doesn't find the
root/boot partition. On all FreeBSD 10 boxes I have this phenomenon is
the same, all boxes have GPT (UFS) partitions to boot from and set GPT
labels to addre
TB --- 2013-04-13 04:30:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-13 04:30:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:14:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Trying to boot a kernel > r249381 fails and I see on the console the
> loader prompt at "mountroot". Obviously, the bootloader doesn't find
> the root/boot partition.
Same problem observed here. r249435, gpt zfs root. Entering
"zfs:z
On 13.04.2013 12:07 (UTC+2), Marcus Reid wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:14:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Trying to boot a kernel > r249381 fails and I see on the console the
>> loader prompt at "mountroot". Obviously, the bootloader doesn't find
>> the root/boot partition.
>
> Same proble
On Apr 13, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/04/12, at 22:31, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>>
Lack of maintainer in a near future would lead to bitrot due to changes
in other
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> On 2013/04/12, at 22:31, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>
On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Lack of maintainer in a n
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Phil Kulin wrote:
>> 2012/12/26 Kimmo Paasiala :
>>
>>> I've revised the patch again and updated it at gihub,
>>> https://gist.github.com/4362018. It can now be applied at top level
>>> of sources (/usr/sr
Hi YongHyeon,
Will post on freebsd-ipfw@ as well...
Does your engineering sample function normally with rxcsum/txcsum disabled?
Kind regards,
Spil.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
> > Hi YongHyeon,
> >
> > Wi
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Marcus Reid wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:14:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Trying to boot a kernel > r249381 fails and I see on the console the
loader prompt at "mountroot". Obviously, the bootloader doesn't find
the root/boot partition.
Same problem observed here.
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 10:07 +, Marcus Reid wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:14:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Trying to boot a kernel > r249381 fails and I see on the console the
> > loader prompt at "mountroot". Obviously, the bootloader doesn't find
> > the root/boot partition.
>
> Sa
Scott,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:31:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
S> One thing that FreeBSD is bad about (and this really applies to many open
source projects) when deprecating something is that the developer and release
engineering groups rarely provide adequate, if any, tools to help users
On 2013/04/13, at 5:03, Scott Long wrote:
> You target audience for this isn't people who track CURRENT, it's people who
> are on 7, 8, or 9 and looking to update to 10.x sometime in the future.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but the problem remains. If ipfilter is broken or gets
broken because of the
Trying to recompile converters/libiconv on FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/r49438 (with
bran new CLANG 3.3) results with the errors below. This error shows up
on boxes having FBSD 10 and X11. It doesn't show up on those boxes
running without a full X11 (that is the only difference I can figure out
at the moment
TB --- 2013-04-13 15:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-04-13 15:50:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hi --
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
> Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
> three months I have to ask: What can I do to have this commited to
> HEAD?
+1
Nowadays -where IPv6 becomes more and m
On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/04/13, at 5:03, Scott Long wrote:
>> You target audience for this isn't people who track CURRENT, it's people who
>> are on 7, 8, or 9 and looking to update to 10.x sometime in the future.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of that, but the problem re
2013/04/13 16:01、Scott Long のメッセージ:
> Maybe something else, but whatever it is, it should be done. If you and Gleb
> don't want to do this, I will.
I already started writing a guide. See here for a very incomplete version:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rpaulo/ipf-deprecation/article.html
___
On (22/03/2013 11:51), Shawn Webb wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a result of r248583 or a different commit, but I
> hit a kernel panic when closing Chrome. I've linked to the info and
> core.txt files below. If you need me to ship you the vmcore file, let me
> know. It's 1.1GB in si
18 matches
Mail list logo
