Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Fabian Keil
> wrote:
> > While I agree that the values are system dependant the purpose of
> > the tunables could still be documented together with a description
> > of how to properly test that they have any effect at all and that
> > it
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> Thank you for digging more.
>
> In fact, it is more likely that there is some bug or incompatibility in
> c++ unwinder than in the libgcc itself, but as you noted, a compiler bug
> is also possible.
>
> Anyway, I was mostly
On 4 Jan 2013, at 20:39, Rick Macklem wrote:
> What about capturing a few examples, like this one for a system with
> 16Gb of Ram. Basically cases of:
> - this is my hardware config and here's what works well for me
> It's pretty easy for people to choose the example closest to their
> setup as a
