Hi,
after a power dip (don't ask how!) my 10.0-amd64 laptop running
r239793 decided to check its file systems.
On /usr it fixed some errors but I am stuck with:
# fsck -y /usr
** /dev/ada0s1f
USE JOURNAL? yes
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s1f
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 5
RECOVER? y
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:57:37PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> This is rather critical stuff (libc) so I have no hurry and would
> like extensive testing before considering it for head.
>
> Please give it a try and report any issue.
>
Looks like that their getnetconfig.c and getnetpath.c ha
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Andrey Simonenko
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:57:37PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>
>> This is rather critical stuff (libc) so I have no hurry and would
>> like extensive testing before considering it for head.
>>
>> Please give it a try and report any issu
If I were you, I would try regular fsck, as here
(9-STABLE) using journal has left me with fs
inconsistencies.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UFS-journal-error-on-10-0-CURRENT-tp5739231p5739274.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at
2012/8/30 Jakub Lach :
> If I were you, I would try regular fsck, as here
> (9-STABLE) using journal has left me with fs
> inconsistencies.
>
I could do that, but I wonder why fsck_ufs is not able to figure that
out by itself.
René
___
freebsd-current@fr
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> >
>> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim K
Hi all,
Since Julien Laffaye and I started pkgng lots of things has happened and here we
are now.
After 2 years of development (first commit "Tue Sep 7 2010"), more than 2000
commits, 43 different contibutors. The pkgng team is proud to release pkg-1.0!
Before going further I would like to than
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12
On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> The problem is that we don't really support the idea of things in the
>> base magically deleting themselves.
>>
>> As I have said in previous messages, the bootstrapping problem is being
>> overbl
Thanks to everyone involved.
I've been lightly testing pkg for a little while, but I still mainly use ports.
This announcement prompted me to switch from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel
(20120827 version) to see how it works with PKGNG. I encountered a couple
issues:
Portupgrade doesn't remov
On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:43 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Thanks to everyone involved.
>
> I've been lightly testing pkg for a little while, but I still mainly use
> ports. This announcement prompted me to switch from portupgrade to
> portupgrade-devel (20120827 version) to see how it works with PKGN
2012/8/30 John Nielsen :
> Running ps in another terminal shows "pkg query %n-%v". Since the actual pkg
> is now gone, I suspect this is really /usr/sbin/pkg. I further suspect that
> it's waiting for y/n input (whether to install the binary pkg) on its
> nonexistent stdin somewhere. I killed it
On 2012-08-29 10:41, Eir Nym wrote:
...
/usr/head/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c:1449:11: error: variable
'fbno' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
[-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
else if (args->minlen == 1 && args->alignment == 1 && !args->isfl
&&
^
-- Eir Nym
On 30 August 2012 20:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-08-29 10:41, Eir Nym wrote:
> ...
>
/usr/head/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c:1449:11: error: variable
'fbno' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
[-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
I have a patch that makes it possible to send an YPPROC_CLEAR to any
host, not just localhost. YPPROC_CLEAR is basically used to flush NIS
connections, so that clients pick up changes done in the NIS maps right
away. Currently yp_mkdb can send this to localhost, but if the
NIS-server is in a
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:39:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> >> The problem is that we don't really support the idea of things in the
> >> base magically deleting themselves.
> >>
> >> As I h
On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
>
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:39:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> > >> The problem is that we don't really support the idea of things in the
>
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:39:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > > On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> > > >> Th
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Jakub Lach wrote:
If I were you, I would try regular fsck, as here
(9-STABLE) using journal has left me with fs
inconsistencies.
Could you elaborate on the inconsistencies you encountered ?
MfG CoCo
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.
On Aug 30, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2012/8/30 John Nielsen :
>> Running ps in another terminal shows "pkg query %n-%v". Since the actual pkg
>> is now gone, I suspect this is really /usr/sbin/pkg. I further suspect that
>> it's waiting for y/n input (whether to install the bin
Yes, if I would answer 'yes' to using journal, there would be unexpected
free inodes (?) or something like that in syslog and inconsistencies if full
fsck
would be performed.
Basically if I have answered 'yes' to using journal, fs would always be
marked
'clean' regardless of state.
--
View th
I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does
much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in the
pkgng database rather than user input to determine which "leaf" ports can be
removed. Unfortunately, the pkg2ng utility has no way of knowing
On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does much the same thing as
pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in the pkgng database rather than user input to
determine which "leaf" ports can be removed. Unfortunate
Thank you,
Would you mind adding create a patch against the git tree of pkgng so that we
can include your script into the scripts subdirectory, so that we provide your
script along with the next pkg 1.0.1 as a contributed script?
regards,
Bapt
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:19:59PM -0600, John Niels
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
> > I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does
> > much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in
> > the pkgng database rather
On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
>> I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does
>> much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in
>> the pkgng database rather than user inp
On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:19:59PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
>> I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does
>> much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in
>> the pkgng databa
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:33:09PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:19:59PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
> >> I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which
> >> does much the same thing as
On Aug 30, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Thanks you should be enough, can you provide a git format-patch patch so that
> you get your name in the logs :D
Here you go.
0001-Add-script-to-interactively-set-un-set-automatic-sta.patch
Description: Binary data
___
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:39:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, August 26, 20
On 30/08/2012 22:44, John Nielsen wrote:
> After dialog(1) exits the script has a list of packages to mark as
> automatic. Is there a non-SQL way to efficiently get the inverse?
> I.e. the set { all_packages - new_automatic_package_list } ?
Use pkg query - it is really quite powerful. This shows
31 matches
Mail list logo
