On 08/16/12 17:44, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation.
>>
>> On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of
>> CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST
my bad, beginners mistake :)
But thanks for the tip, links were more then helpful.
and Luigi got to the rescue, so i am all good now.
btw, anyone else having the same trouble, run the following command from CL,
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -hda 20120618-netmap-picobsd-head-amd64.bin
(source:luig
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 16 августа 2012 г., 21:47:06:
IL> It's a long shot, but if the trouble you're seeing has the same cause,
IL> it should be fixed by this patch:
IL> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-January/037233.html
It looks like, this patch fixes freezes under net
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via
> >
> > There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation.
>
> Oh ... I'm new to pkg(ng).
>
No worries. It is a nice thing to know about, since afte
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:38 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ian.
> You wrote 16 августа 2012 г., 21:47:06:
>
>
> IL> It's a long shot, but if the trouble you're seeing has the same cause,
> IL> it should be fixed by this patch:
> IL>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/20
On 15.08.2012 07:04, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Sites that are based on frames or iframes (such as google mail and
most of google's non-search services) kill the performance of
www/firefox [firefox-14.0.1_1,1] (last updated yesterday on a 9.1
built at the same time) here is the uname:
Same for me, d
On 17 August 2012 07:56, Ian Lepore wrote:
> That result actually matches my expectation... it fixed only a part of
> your problem. I suspected (without very good evidence) that you may
> have two unrelated problems; hopefully now that we've eliminated one the
> other will be easier to find.
>
>
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 09:58 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 August 2012 07:56, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > That result actually matches my expectation... it fixed only a part of
> > your problem. I suspected (without very good evidence) that you may
> > have two unrelated problems; hopefully now
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 09:58 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 17 August 2012 07:56, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>
>> > That result actually matches my expectation... it fixed only a part of
>> > your problem. I suspected (without very good evidence) th
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:29 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lepore
> > No! Not bde! He'll notice that I violated style(9) by accidentally
> > leaving an extra blank line between a comment block and the function
> > definition. :) (There are probably more viol
.. I did mean bde because it's timekeeping related and he/mav are well
versed in what's going on there. bde likely knows about the older RTC
behaviours too.
Sheesh. It's not always about style(9) :-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:29 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lepore
>> > No! Not bde! He'll notice that I violated style(9) by accidentally
>> > leaving an extra blank line between a comment block and the fu
12 matches
Mail list logo
