Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-07-26 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 26.07.2012 03:52 (UTC+1) schrieb Bruce Evans: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 25.07.2012 19:00 (UTC+2), Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:29:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724. I am not a C

panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex em0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c:881

2012-07-26 Thread David Wolfskill
This is at r238795; cut/paste of backtrace: KDB: enter: panic [ thread pid 12 tid 100026 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movl$0,kdb_why db> bt Tracing pid 12 tid 100026 td 0xc6755000 kdb_enter(c0f93c5f,c0f93c5f,c0f91e21,f08398f0,c1825c80,...) at kdb_enter+0x3d panic(c0f91e21,c66739a0,c0f20db

Re: panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex em0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c:881

2012-07-26 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > This is at r238795; cut/paste of backtrace: > > KDB: enter: panic > [ thread pid 12 tid 100026 ] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movl$0,kdb_why > db> bt > Tracing pid 12 tid 100026 td 0xc6755000 > kdb_enter(c0f93c5f,c0f93c5f,c0f91e21,

Re: panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex em0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c:881

2012-07-26 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:01:18AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > This is at r238795; cut/paste of backtrace: > > > > KDB: enter: panic > > [ thread pid 12 tid 100026 ] > > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movl$0,kdb_why > > db> bt > >

Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me the :u feature to get rid of the duplicates. But it doesn't exactly help unless I use the :O to get the words in

Re: Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello all, > > While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the > bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got > duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me the :u feature to get > rid of the duplicates

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-07-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-26 20:18:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-26 20:18:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-07-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-26 19:09:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-26 19:09:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-07-26 22:11, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello all, > > While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the > bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got > duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me the :u feature to get > rid of the duplicates. But it doe

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-07-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-26 19:29:08 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-26 19:29:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-07-26 22:11, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the >> bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got >> duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me

make release recursion

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. I've tried to do "make cdrom" on recent 10-current (svn revision 238763) and got after day of work: a usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/d

Re: RFC: use EM_LEGACY_IRQ in if_lem.c ?

2012-07-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 25 July 2012 08:14, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> I suggest doing some digging to understand why. I bet we all know the >> answer, but it would be nice to have it documented and investigated. I >> bet em(4) isn't the only device that would benefit from this? > > I am not so sure i know the answer on b

Re: RFC: use EM_LEGACY_IRQ in if_lem.c ?

2012-07-26 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:52:08PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 25 July 2012 08:14, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > >> I suggest doing some digging to understand why. I bet we all know the > >> answer, but it would be nice to have it documented and investigated. I > >> bet em(4) isn't the only device t