On 24 Jul 2012, at 23:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> As kan rightfully notes, the assumption that &%fs:0 == *%fs:0 holds for
> userspace on amd64, and the same is true for %gs userspace on i386.
> The change you committed to clang/llvm/whatever it called just breaks
> useful optimization for Fre
TB --- 2012-07-25 08:21:33 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-25 08:21:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 09:03:58AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2012, at 23:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > As kan rightfully notes, the assumption that &%fs:0 == *%fs:0 holds for
> > userspace on amd64, and the same is true for %gs userspace on i386.
> > The change you committed
In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
20120712:
The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c. Any binaries requiring
libcrypto.so.6 or libssl.so.6 must be recompiled. Also, there are
configuration changes. Make sure to merge /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf.
Looking at this:
# make -C /usr/src ch
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
>
> 20120712:
> The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c. Any binaries requiring
> libcrypto.so.6 or libssl.so.6 must be recompiled. Also, there are
> configuration changes. M
Hi,
I have strange problem which I can reproduce.
When I copy some 100GB to a disk via USB when X is not active, it works
without any problems.
When I copy some 100GB to a disk via USB when X is running, the machine
freezes. It does not react to keyboard, mouse and network actions.
When I use o
lem is also used under VMware. Performance and stability should be tested
there, too, before this change.
-Andrew
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt modes:
> EM_LEGACY_IRQ uses the standard dispatch mechanism, w
d such accesses cost ~10K cycles each, even with hw support)
Test case:
- fetch
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/20120725-netmap-picobsd-head-amd64.bin
- start your favourite hypervisor, something equivalent to
qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -hda 20120725-netmap-picobsd-head-amd64.bin
- with
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 14:54:08 Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have strange problem which I can reproduce.
>
> When I copy some 100GB to a disk via USB when X is not active, it works
> without any problems.
>
> When I copy some 100GB to a disk via USB when X is running, the machine
> free
On 24 July 2012 13:20, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt modes:
> EM_LEGACY_IRQ uses the standard dispatch mechanism, whereas
> FAST_INTR has a custom handler that signals a taskqueue to do the job.
>
> I have no idea which actual hardware use
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:48:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 24 July 2012 13:20, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt modes:
> > EM_LEGACY_IRQ uses the standard dispatch mechanism, whereas
> > FAST_INTR has a custom handler that signals a
TB --- 2012-07-25 13:31:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-25 13:31:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
During some ipfw/dummynet cleanup i noticed that the libkern version of
inet_ntoa_r() is missing the buffer size argument that is present in
the libc counterpart.
Any objection if i fix it ?
The change is trivial and the function is used only in a small number
of places, see below (some of which a
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
>>
>> 20120712:
>> The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c. Any binaries requiring
>> libcrypto.so.6 or libssl.so.6 must b
Anton,
I use mostly static openssl libraries, but I suppose it applies to the dynamic
ones, too: with any OpenSSL version (including 1.0.1c), you need libcrypto and
libssl. With the new OpenSSL version, you need the new library versions, and
you must recompile your binary code to use the new d
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
>>
>> 20120712:
>> The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c. Any binaries
requiri
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:29:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
>
> I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
> is correct and suituable as a minimalistic test of this new C99 function?
>
On 7/21/12, Antony Mawer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol :
>>>
>>> Sorry fo the delay.
>>>
>>> About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
>>> filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not par
On 11.07.2012 00:58 (UTC+2), David Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 10.07.2012 17:11 (UTC+2), David Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 10.07.2012 16:02 (UTC+2), Warner Losh wrote:
On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
As f
On 07/25/12 11:29, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
is correct and suituable as a minimalistic test of this new C99 function?
//-
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:27:43PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/25/12 11:29, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> >Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
> >
> >I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
> >is correct and suit
On 25.07.2012 19:00 (UTC+2), Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:29:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
is correct and suituable as a minim
On 07/25/12 12:31, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:27:43PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/25/12 11:29, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following e
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 25.07.2012 19:00 (UTC+2), Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> >If you actually want to test expl() to see if it is producing
> >a decent result, you need a reference solution that contains
> >a higher precision. I use mpfr with 256 bits of
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 7/21/12, Antony Mawer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol :
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevan
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:13:04 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2012 14:54:08 Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > I have strange problem which I can reproduce.
> >
> > When I copy some 100GB to a disk via USB when X is not active, it
> > works without any problems.
> >
> >
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 25.07.2012 19:00 (UTC+2), Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:29:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the followin
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/25/12 12:31, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:27:43PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Just as a point of comparison, here is the answer computed using
Mathematica:
N[Exp[2], 50]
7.3890560989306502272304274605750078
28 matches
Mail list logo
