On 7/22/12 9:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jul 22, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:22:33 -0600
Scott Long wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Is anyone looking at PCIe hotplug support?
I'm especially interested if anyone has a strateg
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
the tool completely dependend on system's toolsets, isn't it?
I know that "
On 23 Jul 2012 09:44, "Hartmann, O." wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
> the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
> also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
> the tool completel
On 07/23/12 11:07, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2012 09:44, "Hartmann, O." wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
>> the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
>> also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. port
On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
> the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
> also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
> the tool completely depe
On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving
> the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
> also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
> the tool completely dependend on s
On 23/07/2012 10:31, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> portmaster now is not recognizing anymore the format of the /var/db/pkg
> folder - for those considered the knowledged no surprise, for me simply
> the indication that portmaster usage isn't usable as usual.
You need to patch portmaster separately from in
On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/22/12 9:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Jul 22, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:22:33 -0600
>>> Scott Long wrote:
>>>
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Is anyon
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:01:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> [Why don't you bother to configure your mail client properly ?
> Answering to email with 500+ long lines is not trivial]
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 06:18:12PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> >
> > On 21 Jul 2012, at 22:16, Kon
On 23 Jul 2012, at 20:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Longer description is that pc_curthread is offset 0 if %gs-based.
> The dereferenced pointer point to the struct thread, which contains
> td_proc pointer at offset 8. Instead, clang seems to dereference
> td_proc from offset 8 based on %gs, or
10 matches
Mail list logo