On 2012-07-11 05:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> I have a patch from OpenBSD that adds -Wbounded to gcc:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-gcc-bounded
>
> Unfortunately it breaks world, or at least binutils, at this time:
>
> _
> ...
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> pe
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 11.07.2012 02:00, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:38PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I do have all this in the kernel, see below.
Still if I don't have device ata, I get no cd:
Well, then, leave 'device ata' in yo
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:03:04AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 11.07.2012 02:00, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:38PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >>>I do have all this in the kernel, see below.
> >>>Sti
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 08:02:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 08:02:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 10:15:05 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 10:15:05 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 09:38:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 09:38:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 09:51:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 09:51:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 12:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 12:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/12 15:46, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> I'm created unofficial pkg repo for patched xorg tree.
> I'm still experimenting with it, but I already have built all required
> packages for CURRENT i386.
Just a couple of quick notes on this since I re
--- Mer 11/7/12, Dimitry Andric ha scritto:
...
>
> Does it catch any really interesting bound overruns?
>
Nah .. I arrived to the conclusion that it's not
really worth it :).
> If the number of false positives is very large, then it
> generally isn't
> worth the pain. Or the option should b
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kim Culhan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Kim Culhan wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
Ran another buildworld and on this run gcc was produ
Hi,
What was the original commit which broke wlan name matching?
I can't see how a commit to usb_pf.c would "fix" this.
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:46:40PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What was the original commit which broke wlan name matching?
>
> I can't see how a commit to usb_pf.c would "fix" this.
> ...
r238279
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Dep
TB --- 2012-07-11 19:18:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 19:18:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-11 18:22:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-11 18:22:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the practical
> considerations that I was talking about. It is very real, and if I have to,
> I'll commit the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >
> > Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the
> > practical considerations that I w
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 02:43:46PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> > >
...
>
> You submitted on June 6th, 201
Again, that just touched usb. So, how'd that affect non-USB wifi cloning?
Adiran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebs
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:54:14PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 02:43:46PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 A
On 12 July 2012 10:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Again, that just touched usb. So, how'd that affect non-USB wifi cloning?
I guess cloning is first match wins and usb was incorrectly matching wlan*
Andrew
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, I think we should do this in general. We already have one example (e.g.
> ACPI IVARs start at 100 so that things like the ACPI PCI bus driver can
> provide both ACPI and PCI IVARs to child devices). I think we should assign
> each
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh
Andrew Thompson wrote
in :
th> On 12 July 2012 10:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
th> > Again, that just touched usb. So, how'd that affect non-USB wifi cloning?
th>
th> I guess cloning is first match wins and usb was incorrectly matching wlan*
Yes, a greedier ifname matching rule can unintentionall
29 matches
Mail list logo
