On 26 Jun 2012, at 15:42, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> While I understand the problems you allude to, the sysctl(8) binary
> can protect itself from them. IMO the biggest problem with sysctls
> not being files is that it makes no sense from the core UNIX
> philosophy that everything is a file. Soc
"Andrey V. Elsukov" writes:
> On 29.06.2012 15:01, Jan Beich wrote:
>
So, i have created the branch and committed the changes:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/ae/bootcode/
The patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/boot.diff
>>>
>>> FWIW, I verified it compiles
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
> plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of the maintainer of XFS on Linux, and while I know
F
TB --- 2012-07-02 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 05:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>>
> > I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
> > the best approach. As I understand it, the problem with replacing
> > mountd with nfse (at least in the FreeB
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> *snip*
> > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da2p2 [rw]...
> > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
> > Jun 21 17:35:34 init: fatal signal: Segmentation fault
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:28:04AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > # newfs /dev/da2p2
> > /dev/da2p2: 16384.0MB (33554432 sectors) block size 32768, fragment size
> > 4096
> >using 27 cylinder groups of 626.09MB, 20035 blks,
On 02/07/2012 13:05, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
>>> the best approach. As I understand it, the problem with replacing
>
2012/7/2, Christoph Hellwig :
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
>> plan to get XFS locked.
>
> Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
> need? I'm one of the maintai
On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
>> plan to get XFS locked.
>
> Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
> need? I'm one
2012/7/2, Russell Cattelan :
> On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
>>> plan to get XFS locked.
>>
>> Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XF
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
> > plan to get XFS locked.
>
> Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeB
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Hey,
>
> hitting this printf in swp_pager_meta_build()
>
> if (uma_zone_exhausted(swap_zone)) {
> printf("swap zone exhausted, increase
> kern.maxswzone\n");
>
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 7:54:58 pm Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, July 01, 2012 06:51:41 AM AN wrote:
> > FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #23 r237852: Sat Jun 30
> > 18:45:27 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
> >
> > After a recent upg
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>>
>> I think you're kernel is seriously screwed-up. Do you have any
>> non-standard (for ia64) kernel configuration options?
>
> I didn't think so.
> The latest was this:
*snip*
Looks fine indeed. I have pretty much the same, except for th
On 2. Jul 2012, at 14:36 , John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> hitting this printf in swp_pager_meta_build()
>>
>>if (uma_zone_exhausted(swap_zone)) {
>>printf("swap zone exhausted,
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:39:32 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:39:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:42:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:42:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:46:30 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:46:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:52:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:52:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:59:40 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:59:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-07-02 14:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 14:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > > anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
> > > plan to get XFS
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2012, at 10:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > Just FYI,
> >
> > the svn2cvs exporter is currently down due to
> > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237860 .
> > I'll fix it as soon as I get back from lunch, so should b
On 2 Jul 2012, at 22:39, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
>> On 1 Jul 2012, at 10:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>> Just FYI,
>>>
>>> the svn2cvs exporter is currently down due to
>>> http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237860 .
>>> I'll f
On 7/2/12 10:03 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
>>> plan to get XFS locked.
>>
>> Stupid questi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:12:06 +0300
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > > > anything by SoC involv
When I built the world as of r237813, clang reported a warning which
caught my attention.
===> sys/boot/zfs (all)
clang -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -DBOOTPROG=\"zfsloader\"
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../.. -I.
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../../lib/libstand
-I/usr/sr
On Jun 30, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 28/06/2012 00:11, Devin Teske wrote:
>> I'd like to announce that I intend to import bsdconfig(8) today.
>
> I haven't seen this get committed yet - was there a problem?
>
No problems. A long weekend put the damper on the process but it has p
Hello Matthias Apitz and -current member,
"sys/dev/atkbdc/atkbdc_isa.c" may not have your keyboard controller's ID.
Run `acpidump -dt` and search your keyboard description.
Is your keyboard controller "PNP0303" ?
--
k...@ed.niigata-u.ac.jp
> El d$(D+c*$(B Sunday, July 01, 2012 a las 06:2
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> Tested patches are accepted
> (http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/svnadmin/tools/export.py), or even better -
> work on killing off CVS sooner rather than later.
I like the latter. :-)
As we discussed at BSDcan -- I don't use CVS
The most recent build of FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT crashes on one of our
boxes with recent Intel hardware, see dmesg extract below. FreeBSD does
obviously only crash on hardware with modern "Sandy-Bridge" hardware,
the very same kernel config and a very similar setup does work very well
on an older Inte
32 matches
Mail list logo
