On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:03:28AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> I've observed a panic in recent -current several times but I only
> have a picture of the backtrace:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/panic_tmpfs.jpg
>
> Does this look at all familiar to anyone?
Can you look up the line corresponding
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
/*
* These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the kernel
* to walk the tree and get the type so it can print the value
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
> from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
> /*
> * These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
There is this:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/4.7/sys/miscfs/kernfs/
--
Adam Vande More
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
> There is this:
>
> http://s
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>>
>> from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
>> /*
>>
Hello Kevin,
May you rebuild your kernel with some options that will make the dump of
the crash easier to send to people?
Try to follow these steps:
1) Configure KERNEL with the folowing options:
options KDB
options GDB
options DDB
2) Configure rc.conf:
dumpdev="/dev/ad0s1
On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
It is interesting, that the old drive with this code are still alive.
Most likely, FS related part will need serious attention because of
numerou
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:03:28AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > I've observed a panic in recent -current several times but I only
> > have a picture of the backtrace:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/panic_tmpfs.jpg
> >
> > Does this look at all familiar to anyone?
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Boris Popov wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
>> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
>
> It is interesting, that the old drive with this code are still alive.
> Most lik
On Jun 26, 2012 7:07 AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>
> as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for
say /proc/sysctl
>
> improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to
what is OK - isn't.
/proc/sysctl might be useful. Just because Linux uses it
11 matches
Mail list logo