On 08/05/2012 08:53, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be
downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on
either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT?
We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at
http://wik
(Late to the party - there was a pile-up on the backbone just
outside of Barcelona.)
On
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Mar 11 08:20:02 EDT 2012 amd64
I am unable to compile libreoffice-3.5. using
either Clang or gcc-4.6. The "make.conf" is appended. I have also
d
Hi Folks,
Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we
think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more
features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is
efficient. I just updated the textproc/bsdsort port to the latest
version so that
On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote:
>
> How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by
> r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revision,
> there's another problem we need to figure out. (By the way, it's
> possible for an application to trigger this assertio
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Please apply attached patch (also here [1]) on top of the first one,
> it fixes channel switching for >= 3070 (called the wrong function,
> doh..) as well as a bgscan issue.
>
> [1] http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/rt2860_1.diff
And another
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:11:53PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > > On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
> > >> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ive noticed trying a make release on CURRENT that it appears to be
looping deeper and deeper,
does this appear normal to anyone else???
a
usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/sys/dev/malo/if_malohal.h
a
usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/d
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote:
> >
> > How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by
> > r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revision,
> > there's another problem we need to figure out. (
On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>> On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote:
>>>
>>> How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by
>>> r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revisio
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
> On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> >> On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote:
> >>>
> >>> How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixe
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we
think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more
features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is
efficient. I just updated the textproc/bsdsort port to the latest
vers
Thank you, Michael. We will check this.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scholz
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:08 PM
To: Gabor Kovesdan
Cc: FreeBSD Current; Oleg Moskalenko
Subject: Re: [HEADS-U
Hi Michael
We found the problem. In the ispell port, an unusual form of deprecated sort
syntax for the key field(s) is used. There are three forms of key field(s)
specification:
POSIX standard: $ sort -kPOS1[,POS2]
Documented deprecated form: $ sort +POS1 [-POS2]
Undocumented deprecated form: $
On May 8, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
>> On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote:
>
> How re
I'm a bit unclear where to define MALLOC_PRODUCTION. does it go in
make.conf or src.conf?
Beech
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsu
Michael,
The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the
good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I
tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We will update the bsdsort
port soon.
Thanks !
Oleg
-Original Messag
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
Michael,
The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but
the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older
syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We
will update the bsdsort por
[This may be a duplicate because I forgot to update my subscription
after changing address but I've also corrected a typo]
(I've copied fabient@ because r233628 appears to have been the last
commit in this area).
I've just updated a P4 test box from r232545 to r235127 and it now
panics during bo
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> I'm a bit unclear where to define MALLOC_PRODUCTION. does it go in
> make.conf or src.conf?
make.conf.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/UPDATING?revision=234396&view=markup
--
chs,
___
freebsd-
20 matches
Mail list logo
