On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> > 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
> > (the 3.5) with g
On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
>>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I nev
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official
2012/5/7 Baptiste Daroussin
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > >>> Well for libre
I installed 9.0 on a new desktop that used Intel's on-board RAID yesterday and
it worked great. One nit though is I had to remember to kldload geom_raid
manually from the shell before starting the install, and to load it from the
loader on the first boot after install. The old ataraid(4) was p
> On 2012/5/6 5:08, b. f. wrote:
>> On 5/5/12, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> Thanks for the info. I took a look at the dump and see this:
>>>
>>> % sudo gdb /usr/bin/ctfmerge ctfmerge.core
>>> [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: Undefined symbol
>>> "td_thr_getxmmregs"]
>
> Hmm, is the thre
The only argument that stopped me is that GEOM_RAID is more active in
probing for metadata then ataraid. Now it tastes all 6 formats on every
provider in system. ataraid tasted only first level and subset of formats
depending on controller vendor. While it is possible to do the same, I am
not sure
Hi all.
It seems that patches to periodic scripts have hard time coming into the
tree. I personally filed
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/165817 and still there's
no move despite change is purely cosmetical and just fixes "right way of
things".
And this is not just one and o
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:1
On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build
> editors/libreoffice without problems (as far as the
> On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:54 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> After applying Dimitry Andric's patches to contrib/jemalloc and
>> replacing
>> /usr/bin/as with one built last Sunday, I was finally(!) able to rebuild
>> head as of 234536:
>>
>> FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-C
On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
>>
>> panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex struct mount mtx
>> @ /frontier/svn/head/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:4595
...
> P
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
> >>
> >> panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex stru
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18P
On 05/07/2012 13:11, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>> On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719.
panic: _mtx_loc
On May 7, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:54 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
>>> After applying Dimitry Andric's patches to contrib/jemalloc and
>>> replacing
>>> /usr/bin/as with one built last Sunday, I was finally(!) able to rebuild
>>> head as of 234536:
>>>
>>> Free
on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
>>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoff
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is
On 8 May 2012 05:14, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 13:11, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote:
> I got this with today's current, previous (workin
On 05/07/12 22:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> ...
>>> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
>>> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG).
On 05/07/12 20:22, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
>> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
>> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
>> building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build
>> ed
> I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be
> downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on
> either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT?
We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at
http://wiki.bsdforen.de/anwendungen/libreoffice_aus_i
on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as
> libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is
> unbundled with clang.
So the "internal" cppunit was probably not needed in the environment
25 matches
Mail list logo
