on 05/02/2012 09:58 Julian Elischer said the following:
> In 9.x ( can't check -current, but teh mailing list has a better readership)
>
> I'm still seeing this and have still not found any solution:
> possible reasons for the change may be:
> 1/ change to kgdb?
> 2/ change to the compiling toolse
TB --- 2012-02-05 09:00:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-05 09:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-02-05 09:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-05 09:00:56 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-05 09:00:56 - /usr/bin/c
I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package
management
First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more
reliable than servers.
Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port directly
into the system.
--
Twoje radio
_
2012/2/5 Radio młodych bandytów :
> I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package
> management
> First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more
> reliable than servers.
> Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port directly
> into
Knock knock...
The X11 Team is pleased to announce the next round of Xorg updates.
Note that this is experimental so you really have to know what you are
doing, read UPDATING in the repository, and follow our exact
instructions. We are specifically looking for feedback from Intel, ATI
and NVIDIA u
On 2/5/12 3:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/02/2012 09:58 Julian Elischer said the following:
In 9.x ( can't check -current, but teh mailing list has a better readership)
I'm still seeing this and have still not found any solution:
possible reasons for the change may be:
1/ change to kgdb?
2/
so if I'm sitting still in the debugger for too long, a hardclock
event happens that goes into ULE, which then hits the following KASSERT.
KASSERT(pri >= PRI_MIN_BATCH && pri <= PRI_MAX_BATCH,
("sched_priority: invalid priority %d: nice %d, "
