Introduction:
I'll be teaching computer based modelling to
year 1 mechanical engineering students. The
unit is based around Matlab, which is not
ideal, in my opinion, but is beyond my control.
The unit is pretty low level - I have to start
from loops and conditional statements, but
ultimately I wa
At Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:15:32 +0100,
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> The following transaction shows that the device supports two luns. I suspect
> that there is a miscommunication between UMASS and CAM layer.
Hi,
I have posted about the same issue some days ago to -scsi@.
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi
I managed to snip out the link I was referring to, here it is:
[1] http://www.fabianowski.eu/garmin_dakota_20_attach.usbdump
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
Interesting timing. I am just in the middle of a debug session to try
and debug this. I know nothing about umass and/or SCSI, so it is all one
big learning experience for me. Here is what I am seeing (snippets from
[1]):
* SCSI command "REPORT LUNS" is sent:
55 53 42 43 03 00 00 00 18 00 00
Looking into this further, I think that the issue is down to Garmin
devices supplying incorrect information.
In reply to the SCSI INQUIRY command, the HISUP bit is not set. This
means that single level LUN structure is used (which appears to be all
that FreeBSD supports anyway). Consequently,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:55:36PM +, Alain BRAUNER wrote:
>
> May be i overlooked something but i can confirm the two precedents reports
> and PR kern/163310, i have the same freeze when trying to issue snapshot on
> the
> root fs when SUJ is ON.
>
I confirm seeing this problem on my box
Hi,
I'm working on profiling support for powerpc64 and I struggled over the
mprofiler-epilogue option not being known on the ppc gcc.
Disabling this option for ppc uncovered the next thing, MCOUNT_OVERHEAD,
MEXITCOUNT_OVERHEAD and MEXITCOUNT_OVERHEAD_GETLABEL are also not
defined. Not only on
Replying to myself one last time, the kind of quirk I was thinking of
actually does exist already. It is called CAM_QUIRK_NORPTLUNS. Enabling
this quirk fixes the issue for me - both LUNs are detected and two umass
devices appear.
I submitted a patch in the following PR:
http://www.freebsd.or
At Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:06:57 +0200,
Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
>
> Replying to myself one last time, the kind of quirk I was thinking of
> actually does exist already. It is called CAM_QUIRK_NORPTLUNS. Enabling
> this quirk fixes the issue for me - both LUNs are detected and two umass
> devices
Hi,
I am willing to update our flex in base, my first motivation is to be able to
have reentrant lexer in base, I first went to the http://flex.sourceforge.net
derivative from flex 2.5.4, I've imported it in contrib, and I'm able to build
the whole base using the 2.5.35 version (almost vanilla) an
I'm doing som data-mining on a pile of ISO images right now.
I stuck the ISOs on a UFS2 on a flash-disk for speed, and mdconfig(8)'d
them so I could mount them.
The traffic pattern his "interesting":
dT: 1.003s w: 1.000s
L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
[...]
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:21:50PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I'm doing som data-mining on a pile of ISO images right now.
>
> I stuck the ISOs on a UFS2 on a flash-disk for speed, and mdconfig(8)'d
> them so I could mount them.
>
> The traffic pattern his "interesting":
>
> dT: 1.003s
In message <20120108222720.gn31...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik Belousov
writes:
>What is the access patern ? Is it random access, or sequential read
>(from the cd9660 POV) ?
Random access to files in the CD9660 filesystem, which stores files
in sequential 2K blocks.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:31:06PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20120108222720.gn31...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik
> Belousov
> writes:
>
> >What is the access patern ? Is it random access, or sequential read
> >(from the cd9660 POV) ?
>
> Random access to files in the C
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:31:06PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20120108222720.gn31...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik
>> Belousov
>> writes:
>>
>> >What is the access patern ? Is it random access, or sequential read
>>
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:31:06PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <20120108222720.gn31...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik
>>> Belousov
>>> writes:
>>>
>>> >What is t
On 8 Jan, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I'm doing som data-mining on a pile of ISO images right now.
>
> I stuck the ISOs on a UFS2 on a flash-disk for speed, and mdconfig(8)'d
> them so I could mount them.
>
> The traffic pattern his "interesting":
>
> dT: 1.003s w: 1.000s
> L(q) ops/sr
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 04:09:00PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 8 Jan, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > I'm doing som data-mining on a pile of ISO images right now.
> >
> > I stuck the ISOs on a UFS2 on a flash-disk for speed, and mdconfig(8)'d
> > them so I could mount them.
> >
> > The traffi
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hello,
> Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...]
Has 9.0 been released ?
I cannot find any announcement, especially on freebsd-announce@,
[9.0TODO] has not been updated, there is no ISO image in [0], but
there is in [3], dated from Jan 5th 2012 and `o
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...]
> Has 9.0 been released ?
I believe nearly all the release work is done and we are just waiting
until the isos propagate to the mirrors befo
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...]
> > Has 9.0 been released ?
9.0 will, and only will, be released wh
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...]
>>
On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wro
Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> I just tried to install FreeBSD 9.0RC3 with a ZFS-only file system. I
>> succeeded by doing a manual install. The bsdinstaller failed: it would
>> write not write the new filesystem to /mnt as expected (I presume it has
>> overwritten the memstick filesystem at /). I'm rel
On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>> I just tried to install FreeBSD 9.0RC3 with a ZFS-only file system. I
>>> succeeded by doing a manual install. The bsdinstaller failed: it would
>>> write not write the new filesystem to /mnt as expected (I presume it
25 matches
Mail list logo
