[rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

2011-12-26 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i grep'ed through src/sys and found several places where WERROR= was set in order to get rid of the default -Werror setting. i tried to remove those WERROR= overrides from any Makefile, where doing so did not break tinderbox. in those cases, where it couldn't be completely removed, i ad

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lisc

2011-12-26 Thread O. Hartmann
On 12/26/11 02:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-12-26 00:53, O. Hartmann wrote: >> I just run into this couriosity on the most recent build of FreeBSD >> 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG). >> >> A buildworld fails with the below shown error. No wonder, I issued prior >> to this buildworld a "make delet

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lisc

2011-12-26 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-12-26 12:12, O. Hartmann wrote: ... Yes, I do have WITH_BIND_LIBS on the boxes enabled: (/etc/src.conf): WITH_CLANG= YES WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= YES # WITH_BIND_LIBS= YES WITH_BIND_SIGCHASE= YES WITH_BIND_LARGE_FILE= YES # WITH_IDEA= YES WITH_HESIOD

Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Doug Barton
The story so far ... sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install configuration role that sysinstall played. More sysinstall components were then removed. Then the old version of libdialog (which sy

Re: 9-RC3 & Super Micro IPMI disconnects

2011-12-26 Thread George Kontostanos
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 6:08 AM, George Kontostanos > wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I started running FreeBSD9-RC1 on this server. Yesterday, RC3, I >> noticed that I could not get IPMI console to apply the necessary >> security patches. A r

sparc64 9.0-RC3 install failure

2011-12-26 Thread Kurt Lidl
I downloaded the 9.0-RC3 disc1 image for sparc64 and attempted to install it onto a Netra-T1 105 that is currently running FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE. (1024MB memory, 2x36GB scsi drives, quad-port HME card in the PCI slot) It failed to install, but not before destroying my partitions.

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/26/2011 18:23, Justin Hibbits wrote: > Hi Doug, > > I do agree that it would be nice to have a post-install configuration > utility. However, I think it might be better served with a separate > tool, rather than a swiss army knife that sysinstall was. If someone is > willing to do the wor

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Dec 26, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote: The story so far ... sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post- install configuration role that sysinstall played. More sysinstall components were t

license question w.r.t. NFSv4.1 Layout drivers - calling all amateur lawyers

2011-12-26 Thread Rick Macklem
First off, I had no idea which mailing list would be appropriate for this, so apologies in advance if I chose the wrong one. For NFSv4.1 pNFS, there are layout drivers in Linux that I would like to reuse for the FreeBSD client. (Re-writing these drivers from scratch would be a lot of work and diff

Re: re(4) driver dropping packets when reading NFS files

2011-12-26 Thread Rick Macklem
Way back in Nov 2010, this thread was related to a problem I had, where an re(4) { 810xE PCIe 10/100baseTX, according to the driver } interface dropped received packets, resulting in a significant impact of NFS performance. Well, it turns out that a recent (post r224506) commit seems to have fixed

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The story so far ... > > sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on > the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install > configuration role that sysinstall played. More sysinstall components

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/26/2011 20:29, Xin LI wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The story so far ... >> >> sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on >> the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install >> configuration role that sysi

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Ron McDowell
Doug Barton wrote: The story so far ... sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install configuration role that sysinstall played. More sysinstall components were then removed. Then the old version o

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-26 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 26, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Ron McDowell wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> The story so far ... >> >> sysinstall was removed from HEAD in October. I (and others) objected on >> the basis that at this time there is no replacement for the post-install >> configuration role that sysinstall played. Mor