On 12/19/2011 05:24, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-12-19 10:17, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I updated to r228700 from 228122 and dhclient exits immediately saying
>> that em0 doesn't exist. However ifconfig seems to disagree:
>>
>>
>> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
>> 1500
>>
>> options=4219b
>>
>>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Alex Kuster wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 01:52, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Alex Kuster
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A follow-up on this is libc not building because of missing
>>> SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT
>>> apparently the Makefile doesn't inc
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:21:14PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
>>>
>>> The most important thing is to have reasonable defaults.
>>> Having WITH_PROFILE by default does not seem to be a reasonable
> > Now all users that want to profile anything need to build their own custom
> > FreeBSD? That seems even more nuts to me.
>
> So that all users that do not want to profile anything need to build
> their own "custom" FreeBSD?
No. It simply means these users will have profiled libraries availa
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:22:40 +0200
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 19/12/2011 17:50 Nathan Whitehorn said the following:
> > The thing I've seen is that ULE is substantially more enthusiastic about
> > migrating processes between cores than 4BSD.
>
> Hmm, this seems to be contrary to my theoretical exp
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
> found recently (my shame of course) in mail list that there is service (
> pub.allbs
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow
> wrote:
>> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
>> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
>> found recently (my s
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
> says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
> from.
Checksums compared to what? How would you know what the correct
checksum
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
>> says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
>> from.
>
> Check
Hi,
It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
What is going on (or off) ?
Claude Buisson
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Am 19.12.2011 17:36, schrieb Michael Reifenberger:
> Hi,
> a quick test using `dd if=/dev/zero of=/test ...` shows:
>
> dT: 10.004s w: 10.000s filter: ^a?da?.$
> L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
> 0378 0 0 12.5376 36414 11.9 60.6| a
On 20.12.11 11:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream
source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I
get my images from.
Relying on checksums that are published on the same web site where you
download the files f
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On a related topic, does anyone have experience on cross-building
> nanobsd images ?
Hi Luigi,
I using "little" cross-building nanobsd images (i386 on amd64 and vice versa).
All my patchs for nanobsd are available on BSD Router Project
(ht
Am 19.12.2011 22:53, schrieb Dan Nelson:
> In the last episode (Dec 19), Stefan Esser said:
>> poolalloc free read write read write
>> -- - - - - - -
>> raid1 4.41T 2.21T139 72 12.3M 818K
>> raidz14.41T 2.21T139
Guys,
I have a question about these benchmarks.
Why worry about that if the CURRENT comes with debug enabled by default?
http://joaobarros.blogspot.com/2005/07/freebsd-how-to-turn-off-debug-options.html
On 19/12/2011, at 22:28, Petro Rossini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a thought here:
>
> O
Now the juicy stuff :)
on 19/12/2011 16:30 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
>> 3. Looking at usbd_transfer_poll I see that it touches a lot of locks,
>> including taking the bus lock. As we've discussed before, this is not safe
>> in a particular context where the polling is supposed to
On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
shown message below.
On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
and installation works fine.
Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last night, cleaning
up all ports and having them rebu
On 12/20/11 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
> shown message below.
> On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
> and installation works fine.
>
> Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last
On 20/12/2011 10:39, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 20.12.11 11:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream
>> source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I
>> get my images from.
>
> Relying on checksums that are publish
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> >
> >> Sleeping thread (tid 100033, pid 16) owns a non sleepable lock
> >> panic: sleeping thread
> >> cp
on 20/12/2011 15:52 John Baldwin said the following:
> -#ifdef DDB
> - db_trace_thread(td, -1);
> +#ifdef STACK
> + stack_zero(&st);
> + stack_save_td(&st, td);
> + stack_print_ddb(&st);
> #endif
This leads to an idea
On Monday, December 19, 2011 8:21:45 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent NFS client crash:
> http://glebius.int.ru/tmp/nfs_panic.jpg
> appears to have happened because some field is
> bogus when crfree() is called. I've asked Gleb
> to disassemble crfree() for me, so I can try and
> see ex
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 11:41:54 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 03:08:43PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> A> we never had a kernel part in the list. Reinstallkernel is not a valid
target after updating the sources. The renaming will only take effekt a
2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
>> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sleeping thread (tid 100033, pid 16) owns a non sleepable lock
>>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
>> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sleeping thread (tid 100033, pid 16)
20 декабря 2011 г. 15:37 пользователь Alex Keda написал:
> I use CURRENT from 2011-11-18 - all OK
> After update to today - I have problem - on start, Xorg get 100% CPU and
> freeze (monitor go to turn off)
> I recompile Xorg, all modules - no happy.
> I try update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati to 6
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 6:21:27 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:00:23AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > An update. I've sent Pawel a testing patch to see if my hypothesis is
> > correct
> > (www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/tcp_negwin_test.patch). If it is then I
>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:22:48 am m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:20:09 am Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
> >> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> >> >
On 20. Dec 2011, at 10:01 , Claude Buisson wrote:
> It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
> starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
>
> What is going on (or off) ?
Re $subject -- yes. It will be worked on.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
And the new patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/usb.new.diff
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.
2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:20:09 am Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
>> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, December 19, 2011 8:21:45 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A recent NFS client crash:
> > http://glebius.int.ru/tmp/nfs_panic.jpg
> > appears to have happened because some field is
> > bogus when crfree() is called. I've asked Gleb
> > to disassemble crfree(
On 2011-12-20 09:38, Doug Barton wrote:
...
I tried replacing both ifconfig and dhclient with the versions that were
built along with the new kernel, and that didn't work.
Looking at the changes in r228571, it seems they also affect libc, so
installing that is probably also needed. Since all m
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Attilio Rao wrote:
As we are here, however, I have a question for Robert here: do you think we
should support the _ddb() variant of options even in the case DDB is not
enabled in the kernel?
It's possible that _ddb() should be spelled _unlocked(), or perhaps _debug(),
bu
2011/12/20 Olivier Cochard-Labbé :
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> On a related topic, does anyone have experience on cross-building
>> nanobsd images ?
Hello Mr. Olivier!
> I using "little" cross-building nanobsd images (i386 on amd64 and vice versa).
> All my patch
On Dec 20, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> 20 декабря 2011 г. 15:37 пользователь Alex Keda написал:
>
>> I use CURRENT from 2011-11-18 - all OK
>> After update to today - I have problem - on start, Xorg get 100% CPU and
>> freeze (monitor go to turn off)
>> I recompile Xorg, all mo
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 20/12/2011 10:39, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20.12.11 11:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream
>>> source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:22:48 am m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 16:16:36 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> And the new patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/usb.new.diff
Patch looks OK. I will give it a spin later today. Feel free to commit if
you've tested the three use-cases I listed in a previous e-mail.
--HPS
___
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:43:21PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-12-20 09:38, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> > I tried replacing both ifconfig and dhclient with the versions that were
> > built along with the new kernel, and that didn't work.
>
> Looking at the changes in r228571, it seems th
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Peter Maloney wrote:
...
Thanks for the info. But I am confused by it, because when my disks
moved around randomly on reboot, it really did mess things up. The first
few times it happened, there was no issue, but when a spare took the
place of a pool disk, it messed things up
I have recently been able to get the new build cluster on pointyhat-west
set up to run full builds of ports with clang on amd64-9. I have documented
the latest results on the wiki:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang
If you are interested in working on ports being built via clang, this
is yo
Hi,
I used to build a few ARM images (on amd64 host) using
/usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd/gateworks/
and regularly i386 images (on amd64 host too) using
/usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd/pcengines/
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger
mich...@reifenberger.com
http://www.Reifenberger.com
_
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:38:34 am Rick Macklem wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, December 19, 2011 8:21:45 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A recent NFS client crash:
> > > http://glebius.int.ru/tmp/nfs_panic.jpg
> > > appears to have happened because some field is
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is anyone going to fix the following in the clang or FreeBSD system?
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:45:
/usr/include/strings.h:47:6: error: conflicting types for '__builtin_ffs'
int ffs(int) __pure2;
^
/usr/include/machine/c
On 20. Dec 2011, at 16:51 , Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:43:21PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2011-12-20 09:38, Doug Barton wrote:
>> ...
>>> I tried replacing both ifconfig and dhclient with the versions that were
>>> built along with the new kernel, and that didn't work
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Chiron IO wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have a question about these benchmarks.
>
> Why worry about that if the CURRENT comes with debug enabled by default?
>
>
> http://joaobarros.blogspot.com/2005/07/freebsd-how-to-turn-off-debug-options.html
>
>
>
In the real world prob
Doug,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:38:53AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
D> > I saw this too, when my kernel and userland were out of sync (e.g. just
D> > after installing a new kernel, and before installworld). I suspect it
D> > is caused by the changes in r228571, which cause old ifconfig and
D> >
Brooks,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:51:34AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> We almost certainly need to back r228571 out. This is not an acceptable
B> upgrade path that would be acceptable historically. Specially, we have
B> effectively promised users that an X.Y world will work on an X+1.0
B> ke
T> An assumption that we are not allowed to change ABI for our own tools
T> strongly discourages bringing in new features :(
P.S. Quoting documentation: "The old world might not run correctly on the new
kernel, so you must install the new world immediately upon installing the new
kernel."
http:
John,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:00:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
J> In general the caller of crdup is expected to hold a reference on cred or
some
J> other lock to ensure that cred remains valid and cannot be free'd while it
is
J> being duplicated. There is no global lock that crdup can
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:48:40PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 20. Dec 2011, at 16:51 , Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:43:21PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >> On 2011-12-20 09:38, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> I tried replacing both ifconfig and dhclient with the
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:30:34PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> I also worry about the problem that once you've installed world there is
B> no easy way back.
When working on the patch for last months I did numerous 'make installkernel
installworld' switching between a patched sources and unpatche
http://wiki.freebsd.org/DefaultDebuggingKnobs
I am not aware of any linux distribution that comes with debug enabled by
default, even on RC releases.
It seems that this approach (debug by default) is welcome to help solve
problems that might appear, but I would be happy if these benchmarks wer
On 20. Dec 2011, at 19:35 , Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:30:34PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> B> I also worry about the problem that once you've installed world there is
> B> no easy way back.
>
> When working on the patch for last months I did numerous 'make installkernel
>
on 20/12/2011 18:41 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2011 16:16:36 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> And the new patch:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/usb.new.diff
>
> Patch looks OK. I will give it a spin later today. Feel free to commit if
> you've tested the three use-c
Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
benchmark real world performance, equally, nobody has offered any
numbers in relation to, for
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:31:40 pm Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> John,
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:00:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> J> In general the caller of crdup is expected to hold a reference on cred or
some
> J> other lock to ensure that cred remains valid and cannot be free'd whi
On 12/20/11 21:20, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
> criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
> benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
> benchmark real world performance, equally,
On 12/20/11 16:55, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>> As we are here, however, I have a question for Robert here: do you
>> think we should support the _ddb() variant of options even in the case
>> DDB is not enabled in the kernel?
>
> It's possible that _ddb() sh
Hmm, if these functions are expected to operate like 'write(2)' and are
supposed to return the number of bytes written, shouldn't their return value
be 'ssize_t' instead of 'int'? It looks like the system calls themselves
already do the right thing in setting td_retval[] (they assign a ssize_t
http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.
Sam
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> Interestingly,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hm, so this lets us create a virtualbox image from what, a set of
> > install tarballs? Or /usr/src build?
> >
> > I'm using cross-build and installation from sources dir (which is afte
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:49 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Hmm, if these functions are expected to operate like 'write(2)' and are
> supposed to return the number of bytes written, shouldn't their return value
> be 'ssize_t' instead of 'int'? It looks like the system calls themselves
> already do the
On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>
> PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
> and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.
>
> Sam
>
> On Tue, Dec 20
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:23PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> > http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
> >
> > PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
> > and Solaris. Ste
Bottom post this time to follow Oliver :).
On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
and S
2011/12/21 Baptiste Daroussin
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> > 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Hm, so this lets us create a virtualbox image from what, a set of
> > > install tarballs? Or /usr/src build?
> > >
> > > I'm using cross-build
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> 2011/12/21 Baptiste Daroussin
>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>> > 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Hm, so this lets us create a virtualbox image from what, a set of
>> > >
On 12/21/11 00:29, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:23PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>>>
>>> PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on Fr
Is there a specific version of the test suite that should be used, to
compare against the published results?
Adrian
On 20 December 2011 17:18, Matthew Tippett wrote:
> For such a system, the greatest immediate value would be to attempt to
> reproduce the benchmarks in question.
>
> Install PTS
For such a system, the greatest immediate value would be to attempt to
reproduce the benchmarks in question.
Install PTS from www.phoronix-test-suite.com or freshports.org.
Run the benchmark against those used in the article
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1112113-AR-ORACLELIN37
You will be
The benchmarks themselves are versioned. So in general most of the
av= ailable versions of PTS itself should be fine. PTS can be
considered = an execution shell that doesn't affect the benchmark
itself.
Note th= at you'll download a pile of the benchmarks, build and
install the
Any version is fine that's PTS 3.0 or newer in terms of being
compatible, since the test profiles are versioned separately and
automatically fetched to match the result file. However, I'd recommended
the newest (PTS 3.6) as it contains the best FreeBSD support at present
in terms of hardware/so
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:15:20PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Doug,
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:38:53AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> D> > I saw this too, when my kernel and userland were out of sync (e.g. just
> D> > after installing a new kernel, and before installworld). I suspect it
> D
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:23:54PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Brooks,
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:51:34AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> B> We almost certainly need to back r228571 out. This is not an acceptable
> B> upgrade path that would be acceptable historically. Specially, we have
>
On 12/20/2011 02:01, Claude Buisson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
> starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
Yeah, my warning 2 days ago that this was going to happen seems to have
gone un-heeded. :) I'm sure you can take bz' w
For those having this problem if you compile a custom kernel with the
4BSD scheduler instead of ULE, does the problem disappear?
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.c
Hi Larry,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Larry Rosenman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is anyone going to fix the following in the clang or FreeBSD system?
I haven't seen any mention of __builtin_ffs on any freebsd lists since
your thread in october, "system headers with clang?"
Ok, just sent the PR → http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163495
And hopefully I'll make another one describing some other issues I'm
having (like world compilation taking libs/headers from system instead
of the own src tree, failing to compile due to missing symbols in
libraries or cha
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> 2011/12/21 Baptiste Daroussin
>
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> > > 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Hm, so this lets us create a virtualbox image from what, a
TB --- 2011-12-21 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-21 06:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-21 06:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-21 06:40:59 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-21 06:40:59 - /usr/bin/c
83 matches
Mail list logo
