On Wednesday 14 December 2011 08:15:19 Joel Dahl wrote:
> Just in case you didn't see the message to current@ :
>
> - Forwarded message from Kohji Okuno
> -
>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:35:23 +0900 (JST)
> From: Kohji Okuno
> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Subject: about XHCI_PS_PP
From: Doug Barton
> >> Having things in ports doesn't make them less available. :)
>From "Julian H. Stacey"
> > It didn't used to. It risks it now, since in last months, some
> > ports/ have been targeted by a few rogue commiters purging, who
> > want to toss ports out from one release to anoth
We're seeing what looks like a syncher/ufs resource starvation on 9.0 on
the cvs2svn ports conversion box. I'm not sure what resource is tapped
out. Effectively, I cannot access the directory under use and the
converter application stalls out waiting for some resource that isn't
clear. (Peter had
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Maybe sometime we will see a project arise that will be a replacement
> ports/ for more than one BSD, perhaps even extending to Linux, (to
> avoid reinventing of the wheel that must go on with ports skeletal
> structs for each OS) ( maybe
There is also mirports from MirBSD that is supported on MirBSD, MidnightBSD,
and Mac OS X. They also got a pkgsrc port going recently. The problem is that
projects have specific needs that other systems don't have. FreeBSD ports are
by far the largest and very fast to build. Pkgsrc comes out qu
Lucas Holt writes:
> There is also mirports from MirBSD that is supported on MirBSD, MidnightBSD,
> and Mac OS X. They also got a pkgsrc port going recently. The problem is that
> projects have specific needs that other systems don't have. FreeBSD ports are
> by far the largest and very fast
On 12/13/2011 7:01 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> Has anyone experiencing problems tried to set sysctl
> kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 ?
>
> I don't remember what our specific problem at $WORK was, perhaps it
> was just interrupt threads not getting serviced fast enough, but we've
> hard-coded this
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
> >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem
> >> has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler.
> >
> > I observe ULE interactivity s
В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400
Andrey Chernov пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >
> > >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the
> > >> problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of cod
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 05:20 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> We're seeing what looks like a syncher/ufs resource starvation on 9.0 on
> the cvs2svn ports conversion box. I'm not sure what resource is tapped
> out. Effectively, I cannot access the directory under use and the
> converter application stal
Since a couple of days now I see this happen on FreeBSD
10.0-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG) (most recent buildworld and potstree) and
also on FreeBSD 9.0-RC[2|3]/amd64 (also CLANG built, most recent portstree):
Building new INDEX files... DESCRIBE.7 INDEX-8 not provided by portsnap
server; INDEX-7 not bein
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 05:20 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> We're seeing what looks like a syncher/ufs resource starvation on 9.0 on
>> the cvs2svn ports conversion box. I'm not sure what resource is tapped
>> out. Effectively, I cannot access th
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:00:23AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> An update. I've sent Pawel a testing patch to see if my hypothesis is correct
> (www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/tcp_negwin_test.patch). If it is then I intend
> to commit www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/tcp_negwin2.patch as the fix.
Sorr
-dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt use
specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
this should be fixed in a clean way.
Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec | grep something with a saner check.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:07:
In message <1323868832.5283.9.ca...@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com>, Sean Bruno
writes:
>We're seeing what looks like a syncher/ufs resource starvation on 9.0 on
>the cvs2svn ports conversion box. I'm not sure what resource is tapped
>out.
Search mailarcive for "lemming-syncer"
--
Poul-Henning
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> -dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt
> use
> specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
> this should be fixed in a clean way.
>
> Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:31:15PM +0100, Daniel Horecki wrote:
> Lucas Holt writes:
>
> > There is also mirports from MirBSD that is supported on MirBSD,
> > MidnightBSD, and Mac OS X. They also got a pkgsrc port going recently. The
> > problem is that projects have specific needs that other
Am 12/14/11 23:28, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> -dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt
>> use
>> specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
>> this should be fixed in a clea
Just read this on
phoronix.com
Is this finally a chance to get GPGPU on FreeBSD natively supported?
nVidia has a binary driver, supporting well their higher end graphics
cards on FreeBSD 64bit natively.
I do not understand much about the compiler itself, it's "nvcc" as far
as I know, and it is
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:56:05 +0200
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/12/2011 19:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> > On 12/13/2011 06:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 30/11/2011 22:32 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> >>> [1] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues
> >>> [2] : https://github.
LLVM is now partially installed in the base system, but for some
development and research purposes I need other parts of LLVM like
llc, lli, llvm-as and buddies. I miss them.
Is there a chance to get them reeled into the build tree via a knob in
/etc/src.conf? I'd like to see them available in 10.
Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I've attached a patch that makes make do what I would like it to do;
> there are some other items that require cleanup to achieve the `argv0'
> prefixing that's available in gmake, but this is good enough for a
> meaningful traceb
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Max Khon wrote:
> Garrett,
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>
>> I've attached a patch that makes make do what I would like it to do;
>> there are some other items that require cleanup to achieve the `argv0'
>> prefixing that's availabl
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of
the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond
disapointing, it is more than inaccepta
On 14 December 2011 23:32, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>
> It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of
> the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is
25 matches
Mail list logo
