Re: 9.0-RC1 fails to boot ("run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting...")

on 13/11/2011 03:30 Bruce Cran said the following: > On 13/11/2011 01:07, Bruce Cran wrote: >> FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 doesn't boot on my Tyan S7025 system: it gets stuck at >> xpt_config: >> >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still w

Stop scheduler on panic

I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed the patch to reliably stop other processors on panic. The patch greatly improves the chances of getting dump on panic on SMP host. Several people already saw the patchset, and I remember that Andrey posted it to some lists. The

Problem with kernel memory dump after panic

Hi! I'm getting if_bwn panics with high traffic on -CURRENT: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2011-November/012481.html And now i realize that it probably may be also reproduced on earlier FreeBSD versions, because i didn't do such high-trafficking before, so i got an illusion th

Re: [Call for reviews] Support domain-search option in dhclient(8)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12.11.2011 21:01, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > I have several questions after a quick view of your patch: 1. > AFAIR, our dhclient was doing changes in the system configuration > via dhclient-script, but i don't see that your changes touched it. Yes,

Re: 9.0-RC1 fails to boot ("run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting...")

I have a machine, an IBM x3550 M3 with an IBM M1015 card flashed to IT mode, in which i can produce this very same problem in some EFI BIOS configurations. I would be glad to help testing/debugging the problem Best regards, Roberto on 13/11/2011 03:30 Bruce Cran said the following: On 13/1

Re: 9.0-RC1 fails to boot ("run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting...")

On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 23:43 -0800, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I had a Firewire card in the machine - removing it caused the > problem to go away. > > > > I think that Sean has been looking for someone who can reproduce the > problem and > is willing to help debugging it. > > -- > Andriy Gapon In

Re: [amd64] Reproducible cold boot failure (reboot succeeds) in -CURRENT

Am 11.11.2011 13:15, schrieb Attilio Rao: > Can you try rebuilding your kernel and modules from scratch and see if > it fixes your problem? Sorry for the delay, but my system seems to need being turned off (S5) for many hours (whole night) to reproduce the problem ... I had already rebuilt my ker

[PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

Good evening folks. During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture supported was Westmere. Testing is appreciated, in order to see if there's something that have to be fixed. You can find the diff here: http:/

Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > Good evening folks. > During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to > hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture > supported was Westmere. > Testing is appreciated, in order to see if there's

Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

2011/11/13 Davide Italiano : > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano > wrote: >> Good evening folks. >> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to >> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture >> supported was Westmere. >> Testing is ap

Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2011/11/13 Davide Italiano : >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano >> wrote: >>> Good evening folks. >>> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to >>> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor m

Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

2011/11/13 Davide Italiano : > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: >> 2011/11/13 Davide Italiano : >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano >>> wrote: Good evening folks. During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to hwpmc. Until n

Re: [PATCH] Intel Sandy Bridge support for hwpmc

2011/11/13 Davide Italiano : > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano > wrote: >> Good evening folks. >> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to >> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture >> supported was Westmere. >> Testing is ap

Re: What is current VIMAGE status?

I'm sorry it's about VIMAGE option. -- Eir Nym On 14 November 2011 02:52, Eir Nym wrote: > I don't see it in NOTES for LINT and amd64/i386 arch, but it's > possible to turn it on. Can I consider that this option is currently > experimental and shouldn't be used critical places? > > -- Eir Nym >

What is current VINET status?

I don't see it in NOTES for LINT and amd64/i386 arch, but it's possible to turn it on. Can I consider that this option is currently experimental and shouldn't be used critical places? -- Eir Nym ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: Using Instruction Pointer address in debug interfaces [Was: Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]]

Hi, On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 11/8/11 9:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > [...] > >> However, if you want to know, my heart tends to be with BSDs. >> Unfortunately, it's a sad love-story where your Beloved keeps >> deceiving you day after day. You want to change sm

Re: Is fork() hook ever possible?

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:41:35AM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:19:32PM -0400, David Schultz wrote: > > > > secteam@ already agreed to the idea of solving the fork problem a