On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:36:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:28 PM, <"Thomas Mueller
> wrote:
> >> I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit
> >> machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg. When I type
> >> startx, I get a screen with
On 17 September 2011 22:42, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Sep 2011 17:25, "Fbsd8" wrote:
>>>
>>> Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/15/11 14:57, Fbsd8 wrote:
>>> Out of the 9 USA maps only "us.iso.acc.kbd" worked somewhat.
>>> The keyboard 9 key block above the a
Hello, Chris.
You wrote 18 сентября 2011 г., 12:03:34:
> I had read the rest of your post, and found it rather difficult to
> follow. The fact remains that every other installer I have ever used
> gives the user the choice of keymap, so I don't really understand your
> problem.
IMHO, main proble
Hi all,
Just keep in mind that Nathan is currently on holiday. Please don't be
disenheartened if he doesn't reply or if bsdinstaller isn't 'fixed'
until then.
As always, patches == best.
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at least
to the uninitiated, and in all likelihood at variance with how much space the
user wants to allocate, it might be better to offer a roadmap to help guide the
us
Hi,
So I've taken a look at the csup source.
The problem here is the updater thread setting the "closed" state
(fixups_closed()) before calling updater_batch() again to handle
fixups.
Checking for size != 0 at that point may not be valid at the list size
may actually be 0 for a short period of t
Adrian Chadd wrote:
So I've taken a look at the csup source.
[...]
What about this patch:
[...]
Oliver, would you please try that?
I have a problem with cvsup, not csup - Alexander mentioned a csup problem.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org maili
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:22:53PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >So I've taken a look at the csup source.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >What about this patch:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >Oliver, would you please try that?
>
> I have a problem with cvsup, not csup - Alexander mentioned
Ah, you're the one with the csup problem.
Would you mind trying csup again, and if it doesn't work, try this patch:
Index: updater.c
===
--- updater.c (revision 224905)
+++ updater.c (working copy)
@@ -240,9 +240,9 @@
*
FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0 r225641 amd64
$ echo |grep -q '^'; echo $?
0
$ echo |grep -qv '^'; echo $?
1
$ echo |bsdgrep -q '^'; echo $?
1
$ echo |bsdgrep -qv '^'; echo $?
0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/
I forgot to add. Following
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-September/027059.html
I disabled vboxdrv and cuse4bsd modules.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> I upgraded on 16th September to the newest snapshot. Everything
> compiled well, but after reboo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
> shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
> space consumed.
> By default, stack for the amd64 thread is 4MB, that should b
Kostik Belousov wrote:
Did you saw the message with the patch for tzcode I mailed to you ?
Mmmh... no didn't reached my mailbox - can you resend it please?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Author: thompsa
> Date: Sun Sep 4 22:06:32 2011
> New Revision: 225380
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225380
>
> Log:
> On the first loop for generating a bridge MAC address use the local
> hostid, this gives a good chance of keeping the same address o
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:55 AM, <"Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
>
> Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at
> least to the uninitiated, and in all likelihood at variance with how much
> space the user wants to a
Dear folks,
I have installed 9.0 - BETA 2, and I had no x, when I typed startx,
some folks have suggested to check if I have xorg-server, I will do
that as soon as I get to my machine on Monday. Also I will check if I
put into /etc/rc.conf, hald_enable="YES" and dbus_enable="YES" as
well, otherwi
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:28 PM, <"Thomas Mueller
> wrote:
>>> I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit
>>> machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg. When I type
>>> startx, I get a screen with a bun
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:17:45 + (UTC) Anton Yuzhaninov wrote to Xin LI:
AY> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:56:41 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
XL>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
XL>> Hash: SHA256
XL>>
XL>> On 08/31/11 07:35, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
>>> It seems to be truss(1) is broken on current
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 09:00 -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> I have installed 9.0 - BETA 2, and I had no x, when I typed startx,
> some folks have suggested to check if I have xorg-server, I will do
> that as soon as I get to my machine on Monday. Also I will check if I
> put into
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
> > shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
> > space
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:46:24PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >Did you saw the message with the patch for tzcode I mailed to you ?
>
> Mmmh... no didn't reached my mailbox - can you resend it please?
See the "Segfault in libthr.so on 9.0-BETA2 (with stunnel FW
On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:55 AM, "Thomas Mueller Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
>
> Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at
> least to the uninitiated, and in all likelihood at variance with how much
> space the user wants to allocate, it mi
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Thomas Mueller
Also, I can't see the function of the 64 KB boot partition with no file system,
which does not boot for me
(Warning: guesswork and supposition ahead. Set your puzzler in low gear
for traction.)
AFAIK this is space for boot1 and boot2:
http://www.freebsd
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message
>
> , Arnaud Lacombe writes:
>
>>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, and the code
>>needlessly complicated.
>
> As I said: Feel free to improve.
>
How can I expect anything to get through, when I can
In message
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
>>>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, and the code
>>>needlessly complicated.
>>
>> As I said: Feel free to improve.
>>
>How can I expect anything to get through, when I cannot even get an
>obvious use-after-free in the ipfw code fixed aft
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:55 AM, <"Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
>
> Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at
> least to the uninitiated, and in all likelihood at variance with how much
> space the user wants to a
.. just a note:
people who in your situation keep filing PRs, fixing bugs and hounding
committers with tested, correct fixes - end up getting commit bits.
:-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 18 Sep 2011 20:31, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
> > In message <
cacqu3mvf5mwqec+s9vkk4mljenmos9q_bjwkbyefzabfjo6...@mail.gmail.com>
> > , Arnaud Lacombe writes:
> >
> >>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, an
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:55 AM, <"Thomas Mueller
wrote:
Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at least
to the uninitiated, and in all likelihood at variance with how much space the
Hi,
I found another issue, this time in bsdgrep-20110912 in port.
==
#! /bin/sh
echo 1
echo 90123456789.|grep -F 0123456789.
echo 2
echo 90123456789.|grep0123456789.
echo 3
echo 0123456789.|grep -F 0123456789.
echo 4
echo 90123456789.|grep -F 0123456789
echo 5
echo 90123456789x|grep -F 01234
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:55 AM, <"Thomas Mueller
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
>>>
>>> Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is unpredictable, at
>>> least to the
Hi!
> So I've taken a look at the csup source.
>
> The problem here is the updater thread setting the "closed" state
> (fixups_closed()) before calling updater_batch() again to handle
> fixups.
>
> Checking for size != 0 at that point may not be valid at the list size
> may actually be 0 for a s
2011/9/19 Alexander Zagrebin :
> I've tried this patch. Now csup "hangs" before handling fixups.
> So there is no message "Applying fixups..." at all.
Wow. Hm. Where's the author when one needs them..
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing lis
33 matches
Mail list logo
