Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/15/2011 16:42, Alisson wrote:
Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
When it is ready?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> Usually rather quite later than sooner.
>
> A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a
> difference :-)
I hate you. :)
Ok. Some third person test/verify that this patch (a) does what it's
supposed to do, and (b) is correct, a
Le 15/09/2011 16:42, Alisson a écrit :
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curr
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alisson wrote:
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/schedule.html
Remember that just because a date is in the schedule, doesn't make it
a hard date. So I don't know, but sometime soon, when it is ready.
On Sep 15, 2011 11:36 PM, "Tim Gustafson" wrote:
>
> > The SAS 2008 chip (SAS 6G) is the one that the FreeBSD mps driver has
> > problems with when used with port expanders. It's the older SAS 3G chip
> > that works OK with FreeBSD I think.
>
> I had crossed some wires earlier on in our discussion
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>> Usually rather quite later than sooner.
>>
>> A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a
>> difference :-)
>
> I hate you. :)
>
> Ok. Some third person test/verify that t
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote:
Usually rather quite later than sooner.
>>>
>>> A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a
>>> difference :-)
Hi,
>From today's -CURRENT:
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.0-BETA
Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300
schrieb Alisson :
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two.
Unsurprisingly, to me at least.
Personally, I don't care. I don't plan with "future" releases
anyway, only with the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f,
>> and -i. There was no way to do this with sysinstall
>
> The source appears to disagree with you
>
> From u
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f,
>>> and -i. There was no way to do this with sysi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300
> schrieb Alisson :
>
>> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
>
>
> Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two.
> Unsurprisingly, to me at least.
>
> Personally,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:02:33AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/ ? It's a
little more annoying viewing changes in the ViewVC interface. There's also svn
log though if you ha
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:58:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
>
> > Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/ ? It's a
> little more annoying viewin
on 15/09/2011 19:20 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> est0: failed to enable SpeedStep
> p4tcc0: on cpu0
> est1: failed to enable SpeedStep
> p4tcc1: on cpu1
> est2: failed to enable SpeedStep
> p4tcc2: on cpu2
> est3: failed to enable SpeedStep
> p4tcc3: on cpu3
> est4: failed to enable Spe
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 15/09/2011 19:20 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> est0: failed to enable SpeedStep
>> p4tcc0: on cpu0
>> est1: failed to enable SpeedStep
>> p4tcc1: on cpu1
>> est2: failed to enable SpeedStep
>> p4tcc2: on cpu2
>> est3: failed to e
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:58:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/
I was just discussing this issues with some others - evidently est(9)
works fine on both older and newer cpus. I see you're active on lkml -
does the linux driver work correctly on this machine? i.e. do you know
that it isn't disabled in the BIOS.
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Arnaud La
Just read this on www.phoronix.com:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTkxMA
Does it sound promising? It seems so. Even if this would be a commercial
product
which would fits into FreeBSD's gap of having GPU compute support, this
could
be an affordable solution.
> Can you connect an enclosure to the SAS 2008 chip card you have now
> and test? I thought I had read about problems like yours with that
> chip on FreeBSD when using such enclosures.
The SAS 2008 chip we have is built in to the motherboard; it does not have any
external connectors.
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, K. Macy wrote:
[...]
> sys/x86/cpufreq/est.c:1008
>
> /* Attempt to enable SpeedStep if not currently enabled. */
> msr = rdmsr(MSR_MISC_ENABLE);
> if ((msr & MSR_SS_ENABLE) == 0) {
> wrmsr(MSR_MISC_ENABLE, msr | MSR_SS_ENABLE);
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:26 PM, K. Macy wrote:
> I was just discussing this issues with some others - evidently est(9)
> works fine on both older and newer cpus. I see you're active on lkml -
> does the linux driver work correctly on this machine? i.e. do you know
> that it isn't disabled in
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From today's -CURRENT:
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
> Fre
Hi,
[added -current@ to the CC list, as the issue is still present in 9.0-BETA2]
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two
>> week
Dear folks,
I hope this is the correct list to post this message.
I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit
machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg. When I type
startx, I get a screen with a bunch of colors no mouse, no keyboard,
just colors. The machine ha
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> I hope this is the correct list to post this message.
>
> I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit
> machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg. When I type
> startx, I get a screen with
Hi,
Shouldn't packet freed in IFQ_ENQUEUE() because the queue is full be
accounted as dropped, cf attached patch ?
Thanks,
- Arnaud
diff --git a/sys/net/if_var.h b/sys/net/if_var.h
index 2dcb6f9..387f614 100644
--- a/sys/net/if_var.h
+++ b/sys/net/if_var.h
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ do { \
A
Dear all,
I set up a scratch box earlier this week (to check that openafs still
works on beta2, and soon, HEAD), and took advantage of the opportunity to
play around with the installer a bit.
First off, let me thank Nathan for putting in a huge pile of work to get
things to where they are --
Hello, Arnaud.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 1:19:29:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (2200.09-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fd Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 13
Features=0xbfebfbff
Features2=0xe39d
AMD Features=0x20100800
AMD Features2=0x
on 16/09/2011 00:19 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> est0: on cpu0
> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 616082506000825
> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6
This is a far more common issue. The output implies that acpi_perf dri
On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Arnaud.
> You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 1:19:29:
>
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (2200.09-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fd Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 13
>
> Features=0xb
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Pester the maintainer?
The maintainer is alumni.
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
>> [It seems that distribution list can be trimmed without any bad
>> consequences]
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:50:51PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:05 AM,
> Pester the maintainer?
I've thought that if an opened PR exists, then it have to be
reviewed sooner or later...
--
Alexander Zagrebin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubsc
on 15/09/2011 12:16 Alexander Zagrebin said the following:
>> Pester the maintainer?
>
> I've thought that if an opened PR exists, then it have to be
> reviewed sooner or later...
>
Usually rather quite later than sooner.
There are about 5000 non-ports PRs and there are only a few dozen active
Hello, Kevin.
You wrote 15 сентября 2011 г., 2:46:21:
>>> 7. On the partition editor screen the option should be the
>>> first in the list (ie; left most side) so if user accepts this config,
>>> hitting enter moves to next menu screen instead of having to tab over
>>> taking more time and effort
> Usually rather quite later than sooner.
A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a
difference :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f,
> and -i. There was no way to do this with sysinstall
The source appears to disagree with you
>From usr.sbin/sysinstall/label.c
/* If the user wants a special new
Out of the 9 USA maps only "us.iso.acc.kbd" worked somewhat.
The keyboard 9 key block above the arrow keys don't function.
Issuing the "man cmd_name" command doe's display the man page,
but the {Page up, Page down keys } don't work.
Also when using the "ee" edit command the {delete, Page up, Page
on 15/09/2011 00:26 Alisson said the following:
> Hi...
>
> I have a zfs pool with 3 harddrives (ad8,ad10,ad15)
>
> I need to change to another machine...
>
> when I try to boot freebsd in the another machine with this 3 harddrives...
> goes to mountroot prompt.
>
> so.. I need to boot with
>
> The SAS 2008 chip (SAS 6G) is the one that the FreeBSD mps driver has
> problems with when used with port expanders. It's the older SAS 3G chip
> that works OK with FreeBSD I think.
I had crossed some wires earlier on in our discussion.
We do have a SAS 2008 chip in the system already, but it's
This is more of a "just for the record" email.
I think I've already stated the following observations, but I suspect that they
drowned in the noise of a thread in which I mentioned them.
1. Incorrect topology is built for single-package SMP systems.
That topology has two levels ("shared nothing"
44 matches
Mail list logo
