archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
This email is in part inspired by the following problem: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/135292 So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line. So here is my proposal. Part I. ZFS and GPT bootblocks. I believe that we do not need here any extra optimizations and happy d

Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/09/2011 10:36 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > This email is in part inspired by the following problem: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/135292 > So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line. > > So here is my proposal. I would like to clarify that my intenti

Re: issue with old linuxbase.

2011-09-12 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 10/09/2011 18:06, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:33:37 +0100 Veniamin Gvozdikov wrote: > >> I've tried porting a few programs from Linux which's used a >> linuxulator. But I have the problem with old linux base system. My >> ports can't be run with old libstdc++.so.6 >> I have e

Re: Serial Port Configuration does not work

2011-09-12 Thread Ed Schouten
* Boris Samorodov , 20110912 07:33: > Thanks Jilles! That did it: Thanks for reporting/testing. Fixed in r225506! -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgp9eg7BIlocP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Call to arms: MPSAFE file systems (was: Re: Removal of Giant from the VFS layer for 10.0)

2011-09-12 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011, Attilio Rao wrote: With the aid of kib and rwatson I made a roughly outlined plan about what is left to do in order to have all the filesystems locked (or eventually dropped) before 10.0) and is summarized here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS Here's a mor

Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, September 12, 2011 3:36:54 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > This email is in part inspired by the following problem: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/135292 > So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line. > > So here is my proposal. > > Part I. ZFS and GPT bootbl

Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/09/2011 14:43 John Baldwin said the following: > I suspect some of the recent changes to shave space down for Clang have made > some of the optimization options no longer necessary. Just a note of all the options in question were added long before clang. > I think the patch is > fine, and

Has ath(4) ever worked one release and not worked another, please poke me..

2011-09-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, I've had reports here and there from users who have said ath(4) worked for them in a previous release, and then suddenly stopped working. Either it stopped probing at all during boot, or it would probe but then spit out errors when trying to get allocated resources. There's been some rece

Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I think the patch is > > fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like > > removing > > nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well. > > I personally agree, thank you for this su

Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

2011-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/09/2011 15:26 John Baldwin said the following: > On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> I think the patch is >>> fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like >>> removing >>> nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2

Re: Has ath(4) ever worked one release and not worked another, please poke me..

2011-09-12 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi all, I've had reports here and there from users who have said ath(4) worked for them in a previous release, and then suddenly stopped working. Either it stopped probing at all during boot, or it would probe but then spit out errors when trying to get

Re: dump cannot do incremental backups when device name is too long

2011-09-12 Thread Martin Sugioarto
Hi all, I added this to the PR DB, because it was requested: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160678 Cc to freebsd-geom. Original report on freebsd-current: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/dump-cannot-do-incremental-backups-when-device-name-is-too-long-td4791131.html -- Martin S

9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-12 Thread Fbsd8
Here are some problems that I fell need to be addressed in the 9.0 bsdinstaller. 1. During the transitional phase to using the new installer, the bsdinstaller welcome screen should have option to select to use the old sysinstall instead of continuing with the new bsdinstaller. Selecting the s

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-12 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Fbsd8. You wrote 12 сентября 2011 г., 17:57:41: > 3.Following the keyboard language menu screen is the "set host name" > screen. It seems that the keyboard language selected in the previous > menu is now in effect and if the keys layout does not line up with > the keyboard you have, then wh

Re: ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

2011-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:13:23 am Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > >> I found the commit that broke ath for me, r222753, > >> specifically, the change to /dev/cardbus/cardbus_cis.c. > >> > >> T

Re: Serial Port Configuration does not work

2011-09-12 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:07:56 +0200 Ed Schouten wrote: > * Boris Samorodov , 20110912 07:33: > > Thanks Jilles! That did it: > Thanks for reporting/testing. Fixed in r225506! Confirmed, r225506 works fine. Thanks! -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.

Re: Has ath(4) ever worked one release and not worked another, please poke me..

2011-09-12 Thread Warner Losh
On Sep 12, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've had reports here and there from users who have said ath(4) worked >> for them in a previous release, and then suddenly stopped working. >> Either it stopped probing at all durin

Re: -CURRENT (BETA1) zfs pool recognized as corrupted

2011-09-12 Thread Sebastian Chmielewski
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:55:23 +0200 Sebastian Chmielewski wrote: > hi > I've tried to import my zfs pool on: > FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1-amd64-memstick.img > My system currently runs 9.0-BETA1 and pool works correctly. > zpool import returns: > > pool: zroot > id: 3239789026273107181 > state: FAULT

Screwy behavior in ports framework

2011-09-12 Thread Thomas Mueller
I just installed FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 last night, now I try to build ports starting with Perl 5.14.1 (successful), then Python 2.7 fails on something dubious, but when I try to build Lynx, ports framework can't find a directory right under its nose. Problem is with dependency libiconv-1.13.1_1. I