Hi everybody,
I would point out a problem related with the new way, coming in 9.0, to
hard disks numbering.
As far I remember (5.0 ?), hardware detection of H.D.'s at O.S. boot-up
numbered every channel potentially able to attach a disk to, and tagged
the disks really attached with the numb
on 29/08/2011 10:10 Roger Genre said the following:
> Perhaps I miss some important new feature introduced in 9.0 to work around
> that
> problem ?
Most likely you just overlook a CAM feature that you have not needed before.
Please see cam(4), search for 'wired'.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Roger Genre wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would point out a problem related with the new way, coming in 9.0, to hard
disks numbering.
As far I remember (5.0 ?), hardware detection of H.D.'s at O.S. boot-up
numbered every channel potentially able to attach a disk to, and tagge
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Roger Genre wrote:
> But adding a new hard disk will shift one, more, or all the previous
> numbers, (depênding from the channel the new disk is attached to), making
> the /etc/fstab files irrelevant, and leading kernel in panic at boot-up.
>
there's a good reason
on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>>
>> It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot scripting language a
>> user
>> now has exactly one chance to try to specify a correct root device at the
>> mountroot promp
Hi Matthew,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Matthew Economou wrote:
> I recently upgraded a firewall I'm using for performance testing from
> a March-ish 9-CURRENT to 9.0-BETA1 (csup run August 21 around 12:00 AM
> EDT). It's basically a GENERIC kernel with debugging disabled and
> things like
Hello out there.
Just read this a day ago at Phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTg0MQ
I've also read that there is work done on the PTX assembly backend in
LLVM for generation code for nVidia GPUs.
I'm still grasping for the silky fathem having GPGPU on FreeBSD anyway
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
to bring the Linux CUDA SDK up in the linuxulator?
Adrian
On 29 August 201
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:12:54 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
>
> This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
> FreeBSD runtime.
>
> Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
> to
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
>
> This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
> FreeBSD runtime.
>
> Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
> to bring
Could I test your patch for nvidia-driver, too?
I cannot find your patch in this mail.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr..
2011/8/29 ken :
> Could I test your patch for nvidia-driver, too?
> I cannot find your patch in this mail.
I took the patch in :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026515.html
And it worked for me.
--
Olivier Smedts _
On 08/29/11 14:31, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:12:54 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with thi
Steve Wills wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/27/11 21:23, Steve Wills wrote:
> > On 08/27/11 20:55, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>> I don't know why the nfsd wouldn't be able to bind(2) to port
> >>> #2049 a
> >>> second time for UDP, but someone on the net side might k
Hi all,
I'm involved in the Phoronix test suite. I'm on freebs d-performance, so
if you have any questions - CC me or
freebsd-performance. Regards,
Matthee
_
On Aug= 29, 2011 5:38 AM, Yamagi Burmeister wrot
On Aug 29, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot scripting language a
>>> user
>>> now has exactly one chance to t
[snip]
32 bit CUDA support may be limiting to you, but it's:
* not necessarily limiting to others;
* a good starting point to demonstrate it's actually feasible;
* a potential stepping stone to getting 64 bit support of some sort in
place (whether it's the push for 64 bit linux support; or to get
On 08/29/11 08:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
to bring the Linux CUDA SDK up in th
On 30 August 2011 01:52, Jacob Frelinger wrote:
> cuda device support is there, what I believe is missing is the compiler,
> libraries and assorted tools. I currently use cuda on my FreeBSD laptop via
> the linuxlator (using the gentoo_stage_3 port and chrooting into it). The
> cuda run time wo
On Friday, August 26, 2011 8:48:17 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> John was working on this, haven't seen an update recently though.
I don't currently have a solution, no. It seems that the BIOS just outright
lies in this case. ichwd is already engaged in some odd behavior to allocate
its resource fro
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:35:01AM +0100, Hugo Silva wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:22:31 +0100,
> > Hugo Silva a ?crit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I'm wondering. On a virtual machine (amd64 HVM+PV), it's crashing
> >
on 29/08/2011 19:45 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>>>
>>> On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
It seems that after the introduction of the mountroot
27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
comparison, like:
= Networking
> By the beginning of this year Pathscale introduced a kind of compiler
> capable of HMPP, a very smart model
> like OpenMP. This compiler seems not to be ready by now and I never got
> access to a beta version to test
> whether it was capable of compiling CUDA ready code. As far as I know,
> HMPP
Hi,
I updated to todays current (Beta2) and it still doesn't work - the
controller doesn't find any disk. I uploaded a new dmesg/pciconf an
uname-output.
http://ugrohnwaldt.web02.lando.us/FBSD/dmesg-2011-08-30.log
http://ugrohnwaldt.web02.lando.us/FBSD/pciconf-2011-08-30.log
http://ugrohnwaldt.we
Hi,
yes.
Dear Sir/Madam,
we will download the OS and arrange a machine to check this issue.
Best Regards,
I offered them to test it directly on my machine, because our storage isn't
at production level at the moment.
Dear Sir/Madam,
thank you for your support, i will let you know if we need yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 08/29/11 11:47, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> I think it did. Lookup of ".." was failing. I think that was because
>> ni_strictrelative (added for capabilities) wasn't initialized and
>> happened to be non-zero.
>
>> Please try this patch and let us
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 23:01 +0200:
> The other thing i need (but i believe i know how to handle it)
> is tell whether .f_event() is called by KNOTE() or by kqueue_scan(),
> but i believe i can use the "hint" argument to tell the two.
Why do you need to know the dif
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:23:15PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 23:01 +0200:
> > The other thing i need (but i believe i know how to handle it)
> > is tell whether .f_event() is called by KNOTE() or by kqueue_scan(),
> > but i believe i can
29 matches
Mail list logo
