I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
Please review attached patch.
On 04.08.2011 15:59, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> I've only seen this on my laptop
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:18:49AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
> separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
>
> Please review attached patch.
Since you are moving the fragment to a function, you may somewhat reduce
th
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
"Mounting local filesystems". I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
Not mounting this stopped the hardlock. I added it because one
installed port requeried it, but I can't r
Patch updated.
On 05.08.2011 10:26, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:18:49AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
>> separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
>>
>> Please review attached patch.
> Since yo
2011/8/5 Pawel Worach :
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
>
>> Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
>> boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
>>
>> IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
>> without any error messages.
>
> A workaround for the hang on
Hello Olivier,
Thank you very for your work.
Using the path I have successfully rebuild, install and boot my system.
Regards,
Christoph
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/8/5 Pawel Worach :
>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else? I can still r
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:52:54 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
> > I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
> > The script anyhow overwrites my previous manual entries in
> > /etc/resolv.conf which I need for my manual IPv4 setup...
On 2011-08-05 11:45, Olivier Smedts wrote:
...
A workaround for the hang on boot and "error 1 lba X" failures is the following
patch, it would be interesting if it also makes the zfs_alloc/free error go away too.
Yes, it solved the "ZFS: zfs_alloc()/zfs_free() mismatch" error when
gptzfsboot-in
On 2011-08-05 02:17, Pawel Worach wrote:
...
A workaround for the hang on boot and "error 1 lba X" failures is the following
patch, it would be interesting if it also makes the zfs_alloc/free error go away too.
...
dim@ has filed an upstream bug, http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10591
Th
Am 05.08.2011 10:33 (UTC+1) schrieb Ian FREISLICH:
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
"Mounting local filesystems". I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
Not mounting this stopped the hardlock. I added it b
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:26:49 pm Christoph Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> The system will successfully boot only if the OS installation is laying on
> the second drive or higher (0x81 and more).
Are you using clang? If so, you should try either using GCC or using this
patch with c
Hello John,
No, I and not using clang.
My problem persists even I apply the patch.
As a workaround I have to put OS on second LUN presented by the
P410i Controller.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Hoffmann
On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:2
Victor Detoni wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
> server configuration is:
>
> Dell 1950
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> 4 x CPU
> 2 NIC ( 1 NIC (em0: )
>
> I want to reach the high
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Patch updated.
> ...
OK; after reverting kern/vfs_mount.c to its pre-patched status on
my laptop, I applied this most recent patch without incident; it
built & boots fine, which is now running:
FreeBSD g1-222.catwhisker.org. 9.0-BE
On 8/4/2011 9:59 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> hail,
>
> any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124 at
> least make up to 8 ?
I have used a number of PMs from http://www.addonics.com/. 8.x works great.
eg.
# camcontrol devlist
at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
Hello Everyone,
Despite the BIOS information about the nonexistent floppy, the zfsboot.c code
will prevent to boot from the first HDD if a floppy is given as a first
available device.
The drive 0x0 (floppy) will be probed before the code below and an error occurs:
[…]
gptzfsboot: error 1 lba 32
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 02:27:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap
> >
> > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/
>
> Out of curiosity, will this code be integrated
on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
> i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
> a bit premature.
> However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
> minimal and it changes no API/ABI or internal data structure so
> it is easy to add it
On Friday, August 05, 2011 02:27:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap
>
> http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/
Out of curiosity, will this code be integrated in FreeBSD? Because it seems
really useful and a lot of programs might bene
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
>> i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
>> a bit premature.
>> However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
>> minimal and it changes no A
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
> Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
> proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
> vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't think Luigi foresees lots
> of users either, but having it in the base
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
>> Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
>> proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
>> vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't think Luigi
On Friday 05 August 2011 04:33 am, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
> "Mounting local filesystems". I traced it this morning to
>
> fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
>
> Not mounting this stopped the hardloc
on 05/08/2011 18:40 Vlad Galu said the following:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
>>> Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
>>> proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
>>>
On Friday 05 August 2011 11:41 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2011 04:33 am, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
> > "Mounting local filesystems". I traced it this morning to
> >
> > fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:34:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
> > Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
> > proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
> > vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't
I netbooted 9.0 Beta and was going to try and install the system onto a
raid1 mirror built with graid. However, neither sysinstall nor
bsdinstall see it fully
I have the box netbooted (Intel Matrix raid)
i5# graid status -ags
Intel-a5bbf622 OPTIMAL ada0 (ACTIVE (ACTIVE))
Intel-a5bbf622 OPTIM
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> > > devfs_populate(), and the context holds only "dm->dm_lock" in
> > > devfs_populate().
> > >
> > > On the other hand, "devfs_generation" is incremented in devfs_create()
> > > and devfs_destro
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > > On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > > I've been trying out 9.0-BETA1: it's a lot eas
Oh, wow! Great news! It's much more than I expected.
Unfortunately I am too far from the Bay Area.
on 05/08/2011 19:12 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
> Its the latter. The libpcap-over-netmap code has been there for
> a while, but documentation was not completely up to date so
> we are both at
2011/8/5 Mike Tancsa
> On 8/4/2011 9:59 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > hail,
> >
> > any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124
> at
> > least make up to 8 ?
>
>
speaking about PM, does anybody already tried new usb3 pm ?
___
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:45:22PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
> On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> > > > devfs_populate(), and the context holds only "dm->dm_lock" in
> > > > devfs_populate().
> > > >
> > > > On the other han
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> and mount it. However, speeds seem a bit slow, but I am not sure if
> thats to be expected.
>
> i5# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=1024k count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 13.996080 secs (7491926 bytes/se
Hi all,
The day before yesterday I upgraded a server of mine at Hetzner to
FreeBSD 9. It seems to use an MSI X58 Pro-E motherboard, having an ICH10
SATA-controller.
It seems that under high load, I get timeouts on the SATA controller. It
seems disabling MSI has no effect. Unfortunately it's a sor
I am running FreeBSD 9-Beta1 (csup from July 31) and I had a Fatal trap 9
in __mnt_vnode_next:
(transcribed from a picture)
Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id =00
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x8086d790
stack pointer = 0x20:0xff
Hi Luigi,
Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is
it?
Thanks,
Victor
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would not want to
see the old behavior
restored. I'll get used to it soo
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> Hi Luigi,
>
> Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is
> it?
unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said
in the thread it should not be terribly difficult.
cheers
luigi
> Thanks,
>
I'm running kde on both and 7.4 works equally well with ttys and with
kde4-4.6.5.
My FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 works with ttys but not even close with kde4-4.6.5.
Is this me or could it be kde or Current? There doesn't seem to be
any changes in the language files spanish.iso.acc.kbd, for example.
Ed,
First off, thanks for taking a look at this. I've always been
uncomfortable with our default nsswitch.conf file because most users do
not use nis, and although everything works with our (previous) default
it produces errors in the logs that are very non-obvious.
That said, I think the approac
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> > Hi Luigi,
> >
> > Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or
> is
> > it?
>
> unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said
> in the th
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
> generally happy with it.
> The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
> so used to the
> old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would no
Hi Doug,
* Doug Barton , 20110806 02:07:
> The other issue is that due to the way that mergemaster works by default
> users who have existing /etc/nsswitch.conf files (which should be pretty
> close to 100%) won't see this change because it doesn't affect the
> $FreeBSD$ tag. If we decide to keep
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:34:19PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> > > Hi Luigi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or
> > is
> >
44 matches
Mail list logo
