Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-31 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 31/07/2011 01:55 Rick Macklem said the following: > Andriv Gapon wrote: >> on 26/07/2011 00:44 Rick Macklem said the following: >>> hrs sent me this panic. I'm wondering if it might be relevant to >>> this? >> >> To 'this' what? > > Well, my thinking was (and it is quite likely completely incor

weekly_catman not generating the right result?

2011-07-31 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right result, e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks like the escape character is missing here). Is this a known issue? Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.ne

breakage caused by changes to mount structure

2011-07-31 Thread KiT Sin
as of r224290, the mnt_flag in the mount structure was changed from 32 to 64 bits. should __FreeBSD_version be bumped to reflect breakage introduced by this change? fusefs-kmod broke after the kernel was upgraded, and the ports failed to build due to inconsistent data type as it is expecting 32bit

Re: weekly_catman not generating the right result?

2011-07-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right result, > e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks like the > escape character is missing here). > > Is this a known issue? Now it is :) This is due to t

Re: weekly_catman not generating the right result?

2011-07-31 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/31/11 05:17, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right >> result, e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks >> like

Re: weekly_catman not generating the right result?

2011-07-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 05:43:39 -0700, Xin LI wrote: > On 07/31/11 05:17, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right > >> result, e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m

print_INTEL_info/print_INTEL_TLB

2011-07-31 Thread Andriy Gapon
Just an observation: - print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c - print_INTEL_TLB doesn't cover all the codes defined by Intel specs - not sure; perhaps print_INTEL_info should use deterministic cache parameters as provided by CPUID 0x4 for a more complete coverage...

libc build broken with clang ?

2011-07-31 Thread Alex Kuster
Hi! I'm writing because I'm having some issues with -CURRENT and clang in amd64. I first compiled latest revision at this date and everything went ok: > [0][root@Symphony ~]# uname -a > FreeBSD Symphony.Gl 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Sun Jul 10 10:38:28 > ART 2011 t...@symphony.gl:/u

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-31 Thread Rick Macklem
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 31/07/2011 01:55 Rick Macklem said the following: > > Andriv Gapon wrote: > >> on 26/07/2011 00:44 Rick Macklem said the following: > >>> hrs sent me this panic. I'm wondering if it might be relevant to > >>> this? > >> > >> To 'this' what? > > > > Well, my thinking was (an

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-31 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 31/07/2011 22:03 Rick Macklem said the following: > Ok, so if the scheduler spin lock is being held too long, what could > cause this, if it isn't a scheduler bug? > > I can't think of how NFS would affect this beyond causing a heavy I/O > load, but if there is some way it does, I suppose I nee

Re: [PATCH] updated /etc/rc.d/jail and added ZFS support

2011-07-31 Thread Martin Matuska
Dňa 30. 7. 2011 17:29, Alexander Leidinger wrote / napísal(a): > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:11:37 +0200 Martin Matuska > wrote: > > >> The attached patch allows better fine-tuning of jails started via >> /etc/rc.d, uses the new jail(8) flags (-c -m), the persist parameter >> and adds ZFS support. >> P

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-31 Thread Rick Macklem
Abdriy Gapon wrote: > on 31/07/2011 22:03 Rick Macklem said the following: > > Ok, so if the scheduler spin lock is being held too long, what could > > cause this, if it isn't a scheduler bug? > > > > I can't think of how NFS would affect this beyond causing a heavy > > I/O > > load, but if there i

FreeBSD9 ifnet + Member Function void (*if_watchdog)(struct ifnet *ifp)

2011-07-31 Thread Olli Hauer
Hi, I just tried to build VMware modules for FreeBSD9-BETA1 and noticed the ifnet Member Function void (*if_watchdog)(struct ifnet *ifp) was removed from net/if_var.h. Is there a suggested replacement? PS: The man page for ifnet(9) does not reflect the remove of this (now missing) Member Fun

Re: FreeBSD9 ifnet + Member Function void (*if_watchdog)(struct ifnet *ifp)

2011-07-31 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 1 August 2011 03:09, Olli Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to build VMware modules for FreeBSD9-BETA1 and noticed > the ifnet Member Function > >  void (*if_watchdog)(struct ifnet *ifp) > > was removed from net/if_var.h. > > Is there a suggested replacement? Per-ifnet watchdogs were transfo