Hi,
I've committed a larger patch to UKBD to make it more HID compliant.
Please try the following patch and report back if you see any regression
issues with your USB keyboard.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223755
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@fr
On 07/03/2011 03:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The obvious question - can you bisect kernel versions to find out when it broke?
Sorry, I thought the answer to that was obvious from my message. I have
no idea how far back the breakage goes since I don't use the cards often.
Doug
--
Nothi
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:35 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:35 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:45 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:45 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:44 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 10:30:44 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:20:19 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:20:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:20:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:20:40 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:20:40 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:40:43 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:40:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:40:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:41:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 12:41:03 - /usr
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:32:06 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:32:06 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:32:06 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:32:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:32:21 - /usr
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:05:22 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:05:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:05:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:05:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 13:05:46 - /u
Hi,
Just to briefly share with wider audience progress on cross-compiling for
ARM using llvm/clang.
I managed to cross-compile kernel with clang for Marvel SoC and run world
compiled with gcc in multiuser. It works stable and I didn't notice any
issues so far. Cross compiling even works from
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:11:07PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to briefly share with wider audience progress on cross-compiling for
> ARM using llvm/clang.
>
> I managed to cross-compile kernel with clang for Marvel SoC and run world
> compiled with gcc in multiuser. It works
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:21 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:21 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 14:50:29 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:37:55 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:37:55 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:37:55 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:38:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:38:07 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:52:06 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:52:06 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:52:06 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:52:18 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 16:52:18 - /usr
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:49:27 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:49:27 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:49:27 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:49:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:49:38 - /usr
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:28:26 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:28:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:28:26 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:28:41 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 17:28:41 - /u
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:23 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:23 - /usr/bin/c
On 05/11/2011 04:33, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 11.05.2011 08:17, Doug Barton wrote:
I had an interesting result doing nothing but switching from HPET to
LAPIC ... no crash. Still on the same version of -current (r221566) the
only thing I've done is to add kern.eventtimer.timer="LAPIC" to
/boot/l
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 19:10:29 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-07-04 20:59:51 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 20:59:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-07-04 20:59:51 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:00:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:00:03 - /usr/bin/c
On Sat Jun 25 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Jun 17 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 16 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> >
> > i reverted my kernel back to r222890. everything works fine now and both
> > issues
> > i mentioned below dissapeared.
>
> the previous issues (xp
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:14:14 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:14:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:14:14 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:14:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-04 21:14:27 - /usr
On 07/03/2011 03:51 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/02/2011 10:25 PM, jhell wrote:
Use csup(1) in base. This is in 7, 8& 9. cvsup has been deprecated for
much longer than it really needed to be and should probably be removed
from use as a client entirely and links generated for inst
works well
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
[Moving thread to -current, added a...@freebsd.org to the Cc: list as he
changed that code recently.]
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
On 4 July 2011 16:37, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/03/2011 03:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> The obvious question - can you bisect kernel versions to find out when it
>> broke?
>
> Sorry, I thought the answer to that was obvious from my message. I have no
> idea how far back the breakage goes since I
On Monday, July 04, 2011 10:37:12 Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/03/2011 03:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > The obvious question - can you bisect kernel versions to find out when it
> > broke?
>
> Sorry, I thought the answer to that was obvious from my message. I have
> no idea how far back the breakage
30 matches
Mail list logo