On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> > wrote:
> >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>
on 26/06/2011 08:51 Warner Losh said the following:
>
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Does anybody actually use kern.sync_on_panic tunable/sysctl? If yes, then
>> in what circumstances do you need it? That is, why any other alternative
>> doesn't work for you? Like: 1. remoun
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:54:08 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
> Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk K
On 2011-06-27 04:32, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__isnanf in both libc and libm. GCC, on the o
On 06/27/11 02:49, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:54:08 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Fri, Jun
On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> >
> > wrote:
> >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 05:54:13PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> For me the idea to send updates to secondary only via
> synchronization thread, starting it periodically looks
> interesting. Sure it should not be the replacement for "real"
> async mode, but having something like this in hast apart
Hello!
I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64.
Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages:
27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:
/usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1614:
REQUIRE(prev > 0) failed
27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.385 general: exiting (due to assert
On 6/27/11 8:29 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-06-27 04:32, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__i
Hi KIB,
Thanks for the list of issues you know about -- I don't believe we have
PRs covering those.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He
> would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:40:31 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
>> >
>>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 26/06/2011 08:51 Warner Losh said the following:
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> Does anybody actually use kern.sync_on_panic tunable/sysctl? If yes, then
>>> in what circumstances do you need it? That is, why any
On Monday 27 June 2011 03:42 pm, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:40:31 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:43 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:43 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:44 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-27 20:10:44 - /usr/bin/c
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=core2
.if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == "cc"
CC=clang
CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments
.endif
.if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == "c++"
CXX=clang++
.endif
NO_WERROR=
WERROR=
NO_FSCHG=
PERL_VERSION=5.12.3
Just noticed, the CFLAGS would disable optimiz
On 27 June 2011 17:42, David O'Brien wrote:
> Hi KIB,
> Thanks for the list of issues you know about -- I don't believe we have
> PRs covering those.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He
>> wo
Hello
Here is a driver for Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem. Please test it. My
subscription will expire on June 29, 2011. (Yes, it sounds silly.) So, try it
before too late.
source tree https://gitorious.org/usie/usie/trees/master
tarball https://gitorious.org/usie/usie/archive-tarball/master
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=core2
.if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == "cc"
CC=clang
CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments
.endif
.if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == "c++"
CXX=clang++
.endif
NO_WERROR=
WERROR=
NO_FSCHG=
PERL_VERSION=5.12.3
J
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 06:58:37 PseudoCylon wrote:
> Hello
>
> Here is a driver for Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem. Please test it. My
> subscription will expire on June 29, 2011. (Yes, it sounds silly.) So, try
> it before too late.
>
> source tree https://gitorious.org/usie/usie/trees/master
20 matches
Mail list logo
